Orvana Minerals Corp T.ORV

Well reasoned Opinion, Facts or Defamation???

[Larry60]

Yogi and other concerned shareholders:

A post of mine from last night was removed today  for "defamation".  The moderator highlighted my comments questioning the possible lack of "timely disclosure" of the strike.  That is not defamation.  Its at worst a very reasoned opinion based on facts and at best a FACT  ie the strike was only disclosed weeks/months (hard to say givent he lack of dislosure) AFTER the strike occured and that we now see it reduced production for the first half of the year by 30% or more.

Who would report such a post for defamation??????

Who on this board thinks the disclosure of the stirke was timely??  WHo does not.

Why would  someone want such a post removed???  Especially after we find out that Q2 was also materially impacted by the strike?????

Is this where shareholders precious resources are being spent??????

[Larry60]

PS  WHoever reported the post for defamation, please do us all a favour.  Explain to us how disclosing a strike ONLY after it has ended is timely disclosure??? Please also address that the impact of the strike was clearly material as it has reduced production in Q1 AND Q2 by over 30%! Dont be shy.  Dont be a whiner.  Just explain to us how only disclosing the strike AFTER it