Post by
kingscorpion on Oct 01, 2020 11:09am
Poison pill or 50% ownership
Well companies either adopt poison pill or own more than 50% of outstanding shares to prevent hostile takeover. Look at Pascallis smart move ingenious infact. Owns 52% of PYR thereby making ithe company a poison pill in case of hostile takeover and owns the royalty that could turn into 50% ownership of HPQ A perfect poison pill incase companies decide to go for hostile takeover of either of the companies. I SAY SWALLOW THAT SHORTERS. Hostile companies!!
Comment by
COGT on Oct 01, 2020 11:14am
Exactly and didn't cost either party a dime very slick and calculated The next three months will be a barn burner
Comment by
canyousayiii on Oct 01, 2020 12:58pm
Trading $900k for over 3 million shares that are worth $4 each at this point may hardly be seen as a strategic move. What was the percent ownership of other insiders before this move by Peter? If more than 50%, then you can effectively nix this hypothesis.