Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Pyrogenesis Canada Inc T.PYR

Alternate Symbol(s):  PYRGF

PyroGenesis Canada Inc. is a Canada-based high-tech company. The Company is engaged in the design, development, manufacture and commercialization of advanced plasma processes and sustainable solutions which reduce greenhouse gases. It offers patented and advanced plasma technologies that are used in four markets: iron ore palletization, aluminum, waste management, and additive manufacturing... see more

TSX:PYR - Post Discussion

Pyrogenesis Canada Inc > Not A but B or C maybe.
View:
Post by ElanS2 on Feb 23, 2021 1:44pm

Not A but B or C maybe.

I have been critiicized by others on this board by being negative and bashing when I made statements about timelines to bring PYR torches into service in pelletising operations.
My concerns were recently confirmed to me by someone on the grapevine concerning IOC operating in Labrador West, and by a RIO Tinto NR dated 16 feb concerning the future products other than pellets, briquettes.

Background: Labrador has a surplus of electricity at the moment. Churchill Falls ( 5,428 Mega watts and 35 terawatt hrs )  is no longer the only major souce of hydro electricity. It has now been joined by Muskrat Falls, the lower Churchill, ( 824 megawatts and 4,9 terawatt hours annually ) coming on line at this moment. Quebec is also in a state of surplus electricity. Three transmission lines of 735 Kvolts go south from Churchill to Sept-Iles, Quebec. Sending electricity north is not out of question. Do your DD and get out your maps and connect the dots. Also IOC has no surplus electricity at Labrador City for torches or for briquettes. New overland transmission lines are required to feed the Carol Lake plant of IOC.

If the power comes from Quebec the logical location for the briquette plant would be in Sept-Iles.
That would be to the great displeasure of Labrador. Sept-Iles is the terminal of the railway and the ship loading operation of IOC. Plenty of  IOC land is already available and more is easily accessible across the highway.

High level discutions with Fed and Prov govs are active as well as with Hydro Quebec and with Nalcor concerning supply of power and transmission lines to IOC. Climate related initiatives are also on the table. Expect lots of $ to be available in the Fed Climat Plan. The present Fed gov is a minority and an election could come at any time.

Keep your eyes and ears open for announcements from politicians looking to raise their profile before an election.
That sort of thing can take many months to come to fruition. Only then will the detailed engineering commence before any on site work can start.
The real benefits to the bottom line may be over two years away. Just getting power to IOC could take that long.

The above is the IOC story. I expect that similar situations may be found elsewhere. The electrical needs of torches are special and probably out of the capacity of existing plants. Big business does not over build. On site tests of one torch may be possible but not a wholesale change over in a couple of months. Torches may be plug and play, but the plug and its power supply are not.

PS: IOC has been communicating with PYR for over two years and is well aware of the LKAB tests.
Comment by Uncleron on Feb 23, 2021 2:01pm
that's 1 plant , the other plants worldwide have power already....there is no delay in switching over to plasma torches because of power issues....green power or dirty power still leads to better quality ore and a massive reduction in GHG emissions....and a lower cost....all of which makes Pyrogenesis plasma torches the best solution for future iron ore pellatization plants....one plant in ...more  
Comment by PteRoy on Feb 23, 2021 2:53pm
Ah makes sense. Peter and these companies he's speaking with are just doing modeling, trying out a torch and negotiating contracts just to waste everyone's time. These multi billion dollar companies are new to this whole thing and just go blindly into negotiations without any due diligence on what is needed to run them.
Comment by itwillbeoknowok on Feb 23, 2021 4:08pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities