PyroGenesis Inc T.PYR

Honeymoon over

[canyousayiii]

Well, the Naz uplisting came and went without too much fanfare, and things are getting real now. It is very simple, show us the money (sales). And yes, great to have several prospective divisions where many here dream that PYR will be a dominant player in each, but on the other hand that kind of thinking also implies that sooner rather than later you have to start seeing some evidence in terms of client purchases. GLTUA.

[Casavantsghost]

Cansoupy you may actually be shocked to know I agree with you.. lol. Not selling though and it's much better than one and bandits or scratch tickets. It may be a long haul and you can't win if you ain't in.  

[SWRB]

I can't take much more of a loss. I expected alot better execution from Peter on contracts since September. Very disappointed. GLTA

[BIGMOE]

Peter, we need a news release on fthe status of Torch sale?  Stock is sinking.  Enough talking and presentation, we need sales.

[SWRB]

A news release on torch sales. Will just be more of the same. Everything is on track. Its getting very old Peter! Shareholders are getting pissed with contract performance ( lack there of by your own self imposed timelines. Remember the September news release in response to McWhirter. 3 to 6 months for 1 to 2 torch sales but closer to 3 months. Well we are into our 8th month. Not a happy

[kjs4381]

Sorry I don't think you can blame Peter for any of this. He can't force anyone to buy or sign a contract. He and we are at the mercy of the buyers. Peter has been masterful at setting the company up to succeed and patents to protect the company. It's not easy for anyone to see the sp drop but it always does in-between news releases. Nothing has changed and definitely nothing negative

[SWRB]

I agree we are at the mercy of the buyers. So why put a SELF IMPOSED time frame on it like he did in September? He created an expectation. Am I wrong? For what its worth Peter has been brilliant with everything except contract execution.

[kjs4381]

The reason Peter did that was, he was using the best info he had the time. But either the very next day or soon after things must have changed. For example, a possibility is company A might have given Peter they were interested in 50 torches, but after some consideration came back to Peter and said what if we went with 150 torches, what would be the cost benefits? So that's how fast things can

[canyousayiii]

Sure. Or it could have been that before they will consider retrofitting one plant of 50 torches, they actually want to test one in a real operating setting. That is the more plausible scenario because nobody in their right mind would go from a model into full implementation across several plants running the risk of something going wrong. It is not always that things are delayed for bigger, you

[canyousayiii]

Absolutely. He created the expectation and we all took it from a perspective that he had a very good insight as to what the clients were ready to execute. Something changed so the expectation was not met. Stuff happens when working with new technologies, and unforeseen is part of the game. I am sure that he now knows better and is more careful, but folk are getting impatient because the original

[Casavantsghost]

Fair assessment.. You're on a roll.. lol

[canyousayiii]

Thanks Ghostman. My views have always been consistent, but they just get a more open-minded look when there is some concern about the SP. Regardless, I am here with a view of being here for a long time. As a matter of fact, the better things are the longer I will hold, unlike some that get out after a big move. So, I am patient, but in forming my expectations as to the future, PYRs words carry

[canyousayiii]

You could have disagreed and called me names but that would have just reflected bad on you because that is the harsh reality. I have been in it from last summer, at much higher levels than most so took me longer to be sitting in a profitable position, but not very profitable at this point. I became a critic when PPP could not back up with specific results his statement how a CEO knows better than

[beethovenn]

Honeymoon over en tabarn..k.              kr..ss the bullshiteux de ka...l..sss