PyroGenesis Inc T.PYR

Vale & Rio Tinto like I said

[Uncleron]

Vale has 16 plants that need upgrading to 21st century plasma torches , how many ?..at a conservative 10 torches per plant is160 torches @ $3mm each is $480mm ..Rio Tinto 100 torches @ $3mm each is $300mm...Client #3 100 torches @$3mm each is $300mm...that's $1+ billion..... for 360 torches at a very conservative $3mm per torch. Iron ore is a 20,000 torch market...zinc + cement +++ is another 20,000 torch market.. I'm sure you now see that we are dealing in billions & billions in plasma torch sales. I'm thinking Elon Musk needs boring torches for the "new" 21 miles of tunnels he just said he was building in Las Vegas...Good thing Peter is having a plasma tunnel boring machine designed...Thousands more torches sold to a never ending insatiable demand from this emerging "new" tunnel boring industry....Torches alone would make Pyrogenesis a blue chip company...uncleron is always right !..cheers Vale does have mucho cash , so maybe a hefty down payment on a long term leasing contract or a cash payment for each torch batch delivered , with a hefty down payment of course. Same for Rio Tinto & all the other torch clients.

[ScienceFirst]

Looks like our UncleCon didn't listen to the interview: "Good thing Peter is having a plasma tunnel boring machine designed...Thousands more torches sold to a never ending insatiable demand from this emerging "new" tunnel boring industry...." What a irresponsible and immature con! _____________________________ Uncleron - (11/3/2021 3:48:56 PM) Vale & Rio

[sbbb2x2]

Ulceron, you have not been right about a  thing in the past 8 months. Why don't you just shut up. If you had bothered to watch, PPP has moved AWAY from tunneling. GLTA Longs SBBB

[settoretire]

Don't you realize this Uncleron character sits at the table. He is just passing info ( false as it might be ) to the general share holders without having to put out news through proper channels. Optomism is a good thing and PYR is the flavor right now, but I tend to agree with you that he is a bit off the wall on facts. ( on contracts present and future )  Gotta love his optomism though

[windywolf]

Heya Unc. Like Ive said before i would perfer to see the torches leased. Cash flow baby. Nice to see more green today. Go Pyr Go. Thumb for u UNC.

[canyousayiii]

Heya, Windy. You missed 3P's explanation how leasing versus buying has no impact on PYR's revenues or cashflow stream. You may want to inform yourself.

[windywolf]

So you are saying leasing or selling of torches has no impact on revenue? OOOOKAY? Side note. I expect revenue to over 10mill this Q.

[canyousayiii]

Yes, I am saying that leasing or selling torches has no impact on PYR's revenue. When a client decides to "get" the torches from PYR, they can pay the initial purchase price upfront or they can lease it which amounts to spreading out the payment over some term. As 3P explained...again...as 3P explained, for PYR, it has no impact on revenues....they get the upfront purchase price

[ScienceFirst]

Canyousayiii ... You are correct in your assumption (that it makes no difference whatsover whether Clients pay cash upfront or lease).  And you cited Peter appropriately.