Post by
StairwayTo on Dec 01, 2021 5:19pm
Torch
There is got to be something that prevents the clients to jump all over the idea of replacing their burners with Pyro plasma torches.
Regardless of pending government grants or GHG incentives, if it would cost less to operate, starting tomorrow, why doesn’t it happen faster?
They don’t care about tax loss season, or Christmas coming up, or a new virus variant.
I would like to see the cost estimate provided to one of the client, but that won’t happen.
Comment by
Yaya21 on Dec 01, 2021 5:48pm
The upfront capital cost?
Comment by
StairwayTo on Dec 01, 2021 6:03pm
Capital cost a $1.5M equipment that will save you $ in the short and long term, for a multi billion dollar company? ..
Comment by
Yaya21 on Dec 01, 2021 6:17pm
Pyr tech is a nice to have tech, not verified as a need to have tech. When management can convince the industries that it's a need to have tech we will see major sales.
Comment by
Magbeach123 on Dec 01, 2021 8:04pm
If the company that is purchasing the torches (and foregoes the grants) walks away from free or subsidized monies how does that look from a shareholder fiduciary standpoint? I would not overlook the grants or carbon credits, etc. it could have a lot to do with the timing or hesidency to taking a dive into the deep end of the pool IMO
Comment by
SmiteWorx on Dec 02, 2021 6:17pm
I have wondered if it is resources. There are just so many qualified employees at these industrial companies that can do this type of work. And it is not just the torch that comes from pyro, there is wiring, piping, control panels, all kinds of 'lectrical stuff, new control and monitoring systems, training, safety...who knows...even unions to contend with.