PyroGenesis Inc T.PYR

Your hostility is misdirected

[tamaracktop]

I'm not the enemy, although many people respond as if I am.

I get trashed for calling out management.

This stock hasn't underperformed because of my posts, it's underperformed because management has failed to execute, plain and simple. 

Management has consistently done failed to deliver on grandiose promises made over the last several years, and has allowed the balance sheets to deteriorate to such a woeful state that the company was declined a financing because of liquidity concerns. 

I find it hard to believe how many posters here offer "praise" for your Peter and how few are critical. 

You should be directing your criticism at management, not at me.

I suppose criticism is off limits because your Peter is the steward of your investment. 

The "Captain" of the ship.

There's nothing you can do about it anyway, he just elects himself CEO, awards himself more options, and sells more stock. 

He sold some at $0.97 in February, but then he bought it back.

I don't suppose he knew there was a financing around the corner at a buck for stock and warrants. 

People here are blind to facts. 

When this company fails, are you going to blame me for that too?

[Brieguy]

Of course PYRs performance has nothing to do with your posts. Bravo for your comment. Smartest comment you have made on this board! Nothing anyone says here will effect PYRs price. So why do you continue to post? That sums it all up wouldn't you say? Your opinion doesn't matter. My opinion doesn't matter No need to continually post if you just admitted you can't influence people

[tamaracktop]

Arrogance isn't appropriate in this context.  Decency would fit. You have 19 1/2 hours of trading left to insult me. After that, I don't expect we'll hear from you again.  Probably not from anybody for that matter.  Good night .

[Nerdy123]

Markets are forward-looking. And next quarter is going to be incredible! Can't wait for the tier-one aerospatial company qualification announcement.

[tamaracktop]

No question at all they are. 

[ScienceFirst]

  Nerdy123 ... That's exactly that.  Nice post. - final step in 3D-printing powder certification with Boeing (N-A top tier aerospace manufacturer) - final site tests (SAT) with 2 iron pelletization players (VALE and RIO TINTO). Ever noticed that Tamarackflop never addresses those major pending events? ______________   Nerdy123 - (3/28/2023 11:19:27 AM)

[raphaelle2]

Don't hold your breath Nerdy... Tier-one, by definition, will only get associated with proven, established and credible suppliers ( which abound). But this does not prevent them from shopping around as part of their intelligence  activities. GLTA

[Nerdy123]

Nonsense. They wouldn't be scouting around if they only got involved with already established companies. They are in fact looking for new technologies that will give them a competitive advantage. Innovate or die as they say.

[ScienceFirst]

Nerdy ... Raphaelle2 is part of the FUD squad.  He's shorting PYR.

[raphaelle2]

Yes innovation is required for AM . But the raw material itself is not the most critical element in the whole series of manufacturing steps. And the cost of RM  itself is small compared to the finish products value ( based on performance and reliability,  specially for aircrafts). I am not saying that PYR could not become eventually a supplier...but this will be a very slow and gradual

[BCONTVentures]

Also keep in mind that Boeing used PyroGenesis' 3D printing powders for 2 studies: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/3/705/pdf https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/2/530/pdf With 3D printing/additive manufacturing, the testing schedule adheres to very strict guidelines/regulations.  The fact that Boeing selected PyroGenesis for these studies further validates PYR's powders

[raphaelle2]

Yes and...No. Boeing  and DOE are financing different Universities conducting R&D...using different type of RM available out there. Just routine business. Don't read more than it's there.  The problem is not with Boeing or others potential users/ supliers. The problem is with PYR. Until they learn to under promise and over deliver...the financial community  will keep

[Casavantsghost]

Why would you assume anyone would care if you have an opinion on whether or not you want to debate anyone?