PyroGenesis Inc T.PYR

Client C = ArcelorMittal

[ScienceFirst]

Their iron pelletization project was initiated early 2021.  It fits the timing where PYR first mention about Client C.

[ScienceFirst]

This below, taken from the July 2020 news release, clearly fits what is mentioned in the LaPresse article. New Development – Client C A new potential client (“Client C”), who is not only a significant player in the iron ore pelletization industry but is also a major player in the steel industry, has entered into active equipment purchase discussions with the Company. There seems to be a high

[developbc]

AND...Pyrogenesis holds the patent for plasma torches applications for iron ore induration furnaces.  This is a massive industry that needs to get off bio diesel and bunker fuels as CO2 carbon tax penalties will force change...Pyrogenesis tech and engineering is seriously legit.   Long and strong PYROGENESIS!!!

[raphaelle2]

I see that developbc and his little bunch of  losers ( pseudo scientific/technical  pumpers)   are still spreading FUD ( False Unproven Declarations) about Arcelor, like they keep doing about  the others large miners to keep confusing gullible SH. For your education, Arcelor, like Vale has made its technological decision for their new pellets plant they are starting to

[developbc]

Says the toxic negative FUD basher that only posts negative trash.  Hydrogen is still carbon emitting pollutants.   Long and strong PYROGENESIS!!

[developbc]

Apologies longs...meant to say natural gas is still carbon emitting.   AND EVEN IF  in 10 years some of the NEW plants are hydrogen ...there are billions of dollars of EXISTING iron ore plants that are not just going to stop producing.   Pyrogenesis are targetting EXISTING iron ore plants which there are multiple billions of upstream plasma torch applications which they

[raphaelle2]

PYR is barking up the wrong tree...as usual. Most of these old pellets plants that you are refering to will be shut down in 10-20 years because they are producing high silica iron ore pellets which need to be processed by existing conventional carbon blast furnace. This is why Arcelor is building the largest in the world integrated flotation/ pellets plants in Port Cartier  to make low

[raphaelle2]

Last thing developpc, Do you really beleive that an old paper patent has any value for these large co.? Get real. Where do you live? Dont beleive everything PYR is telling you. GLTA  

[filoux004]

Thanks Raphalle for the technical update much appreciated. 

[developbc]

2050 as you state is MORE than enough lifespan for PYR torches which have an economic life of 15-20 years.   PYR plasma torches are more cost efficient , saves on expensive carbon taxes and helps produce better quality iron ore pellet at the upstream stage.  AND they are plug and play which can swap out exisitng diesel burners.    As IF the industry is not interested in

[raphaelle2]

OK  " PLUG AND PLAY"  I get it. You do believe everything PYR is telling you. I rest my case. GLTA.

[beachbuminMexic]

And don't believe everything raphaelle2 is telling you either. Just a few reasons why hydrogen may not be the future choice of fuel for pelletization. Hydrogen is a highly inflammable substance and explosive in nature; it cannot be easily transported from one place to another and it can be generated by the hydrolysis of water but it is a very expensive process.Hydrogen is a highly inflammable

[raphaelle2]

Green hydrogen is carbon emitting pollutants say the chief pumper...LOL It's better to keep your mouth shut and appears stupid than open it and remove all doubts... GLTA 

[developbc]

Learn to read as I posted meant to say natural gas is still carbon emitting.   AND EVEN IF  in 10 years some of the NEW plants are hydrogen ...there are billions of dollars of EXISTING iron ore plants that are not just going to stop producing.   Pyrogenesis are targetting EXISTING iron ore plants which there are multiple billions of upstream plasma torch applications

[Sidewindergo]

Raphaelle2, it's notable that you raise some solid theories and yet look down upon the use of green electricity to make  heat. Is there any reason why you didn't compare energy efficiency and capital costs between electricity and hydrogen? Folks, I highly recommend researching electricity and hydrogen and the associated supply chains.