PyroGenesis Inc T.PYR

Low volume

[wasitreallyok]

Bit of news on Fumed Silica samples and the volume has barely moved. Doesn't seem to be much interest in the stock even at this low price on the TSX a bit more volume on Nazdaq.

[raphaelle2]

Not really a surprise...let's put things in perspectives. Production of fumed silica is around 275 000,00 TPY. Or 275 000 000, of kg per year! Mostly from Asia Pacific region. And from many ( > 35 ) large producers worldwide.  Presently the largest producers are converting their large arc furnaces to biochar ( instead of coal) to produce " green silicon". As far as the use of

[ScienceFirst]

Raphaelle2... Given that: - you oppose to everything that comes out of PYR/HPQ - that last week, the IOC EO debunked your false claims regarding plasma torches in the iron ore - that those behind PYR and HPQ NDAs have better credibility than you then why one would listen to your pathetic rhetorics and your FUD agenda?

[raphaelle2]

SF, Great minds think alike...but fools seldom differ! Chose your camp, even if you don't like to be bothered by facts. I challenge you to have the nerve to put me on ignore lol GLTA the well informed!

[ScienceFirst]

Poor Raphaelle2! 1) You were debunked by IOC's VP post on-site in Labrador City with his team that set up the plasma torches pilot.  Prior to that post, you were denying RIOTINTO/IOC would move forward with such a pilot!  FUD and incompetency from your part.   2) You've been debunked once again last week, this time by no one else than IOC's CEO on 2 topics: a

[ScienceFirst]

Raphaelle2 ... You're easy to debunk as you turn into ridicule PYR and HPQ innovations, no matter the topic or business lines! You are whether in-the-know or a pure manipulator. You cannot be in-the-know as PYR staff wouldn't disclose their work as they are under strict confidentiality rules.  And they still progress in their work.   Because, it is innovation, and that you'

[raphaelle2]

My dear ScienceF. Your appalling naivety hurts. Take it easy on the donuts and coffee, and keeps your eyes on the bottom line. GLTA

[Marseille11]

Do you have any sources for that because the number are lower then what I got from chatgpt... Nice attends a creating fud, Also regarding you BS coment about Silane beings used in a close loop, nice attempt at changing the subject... fact is that traditional process start from Silicon metal while HPQ starts from quartz so you comment had no factual reason to be there other then making FUD.

[raphaelle2]

Hey Marseille, I am afraid that you missed my point. 1- on the volume. Ok let's say that yr numbers are better than mine ( I am always a little conservative. Contrarily to Bernard may be!). But this just reinforce my point. That there is plenty of existing producers feeding the present and future demand. 2- Presently most of the Si metal producers ( close to 10 millions TPY WW) are producing

[beachbuminMexic]

raphaelle2 are you on drugs man, your all over the place and not making any sense at all. 

[Marseille11]

You keep making points... you say volume was low, funny but on what the site I check HPQ volume was in the top 30... of all the stock on the venture  you are really clueless, the material produce doing silicon metal is not Fumed Silica but Silicon fume, not the same but since when they fact ever bothered you  Your point about Silane is another mental menstruations of a fudster... HPQ

[raphaelle2]

Silicon fume ! LOL Is that so ! Where were you during the chemistry classes? Get some help. GLTA