Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum PyroGenesis Inc T.PYR

Alternate Symbol(s):  PYRGF

PyroGenesis Inc., formerly PyroGenesis Canada Inc., is a Canada-based high-tech company. The Company is engaged in the design, development, manufacture and commercialization of advanced plasma processes and sustainable solutions which reduce greenhouse gases (GHG). The Company has created proprietary, patented and advanced plasma technologies that are used in four markets: iron ore... see more

TSX:PYR - Post Discussion

PyroGenesis Inc > AMF from the NR 2023 Aug.
View:
Post by TheShare on May 11, 2024 3:42am

AMF from the NR 2023 Aug.

The AMF has initiated administrative proceedings against Mr. Pascali, Alan Curleigh, who is a director of the Company, and the Company, for actions taken in connection with the 2018 Phoenix Transactions. The AMF alleges that Mr. Pascali was in breach of section 199.1(2) of the Securities Act (Qubec), that Mr. Pascali and the Company made misrepresentations in breach of sections 196 and 197 of the Securities Act (Qubec), that Mr. Pascali and the Company failed to comply with certain disclosure obligations under applicable securities legislation, and that Mr. Pascali and Mr. Curleigh failed to comply with their fiduciary duties as directors of the Company. The AMF is seeking administrative penalties totaling $4.20 million against Mr. Pascali, and a disgorgement order of $9.57 million to the AMF also from Mr. Pascali. The AMF is also seeking administrative penalties totaling $550,000 against the Company. Separately, the AMF is also seeking orders prohibiting Mr. Pascali and Mr. Curleigh to act as an officer or director of a reporting issuer for 5 years.

“It is disappointing that after several years of an extensive investigation by the AMF and cooperation by PyroGenesis, the AMF felt that these proceedings were warranted,” said Mr. P. Pascali. “The Company will welcome its day in court where we are confident the truth will prevail and the motives behind those who supported this outcome will be exposed.”

Based on prior AMF proceedings, these proceedings will likely take years to conclude. In the interim, investors can take comfort from the fact that after several years of investigation in which events occurring over a period of over 12 years were thoroughly reviewed, all allegations are in connection with only the 2018 Phoenix Transactions. Separately, investors should be reassured by the fact that the administrative penalties being sought against the Company are limited to $550,000, with the vast majority of the financial penalties and costs sought against Mr. Pascali. Management expects to be less distracted by these proceedings compared to the investigation process over the past several years. Management is committed to continue to operate PyroGenesis in the ordinary course with unwavering dedication to our clients and pursuing our shared goals.

Each of Mr. Pascali, Mr. Curleigh and the Company denies the allegations against him/it, believes they are without merit, and will vigorously defend himself/itself. The operations of the Company continue as usual. The Company, Mr. Pascali and Mr. Curleigh will continue to cooperate with the AMF, if and as requested, consistent with their practice to always cooperate with regulatory authorities.

Worst case
the ceo has to pay
Some said he is rich enough so this shouldn't be an issue.
PYR has to pay $ 550.000 

I don't think this is an issue

The ceo must retire.
As I do understand this there would be no problem to work as a PYR consultant.
No issue

And finally PYR and the ceo could appeal against the AMF decision.

So as stated in the NR above this whole story could last years.

IMO until the final decision is made crucial contracts have long be signed.

Comment by dalesio_98 on May 11, 2024 4:25am
TheShare, I disagree with most of your comments. Thank you for sharing your opinion. Good luck to All!
Comment by Newsday101 on May 11, 2024 7:04am
lot of people disagree with your comments and very transparent tactics of bashing PYR...   The good point about your posts is that leave a paper trail of your  defaming activities...   Bye the way, your good luck to all statement does not protect you for the responsibility associated with your consequences of your actions. But that does not stop you, so keep up your ...more  
Comment by dalesio_98 on May 11, 2024 11:04am
SMH Good luck to All! 
Comment by paul03 on May 11, 2024 11:17am
As far as I can remember that poster is the only one that has voluntarily revealed his full name on these boards. He's been around Pyr legal teams etc in person and some of you think there's defaming activities going on?   Come on everyone's gotta be better here. Not my favourite poster but defaming?  I don't agree with that comment.
Comment by dalesio_98 on May 11, 2024 11:49am
Paul03, Thank you for your comment! Enjoy your weekend. Good luck to All!
Comment by sumpineh on May 11, 2024 12:02pm
Great post. Paul03 and HARJAY have been the only posters to recognize that dalesio_98 is posting information that should benifit all investors whether potential or existing..Definitely a cut above the crowd.
Comment by dalesio_98 on May 11, 2024 3:00pm
Sumpineh, Thank you for your comment! Good luck to All!
Comment by tamaracktop on May 11, 2024 1:13pm
You're clearly not familiar with the law Newsday. It's not defamation if it's factual.  Period.
Comment by Holdrrrr on May 11, 2024 12:53pm
Please provide me with ONE SINGLE post in reference to this whole debacle, that delousio has provided or produced that provides more information or insight than the original statement from the company itself on the matter. Because besides calling the CEO and alleged fraudster, telling us the directors testified(duh), and the amf requested a document and it wasn't given to them.  I see ...more  
Comment by dalesio_98 on May 11, 2024 2:25pm
Holdrrrr, You have me on ignore. Hypocritical! Good luck to All!
Comment by dalesio_98 on May 11, 2024 2:40pm
Holdrrrr, I provided everything thus far from the TMF tribunal hearings which were not available readily.  You complain, yet, you certainly didn't look at them. I will provide the argumentation plan documents today and Pyro Special Committee document as soon as I obtain the same. Pertinent phrase: "you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink". Your ...more  
Comment by Newsday101 on May 11, 2024 3:01pm
Please explain to us the relevance of your findings about the special committee... I would not be surprised that it will be mentioned in the information circular... just like the any board committee, you know the audit committee, the remuneration committee... etc... Board can create as many committees as they want... Nothing special about that. For me, this follows your pattern to look ...more  
Comment by Holdrrrr on May 11, 2024 3:11pm
The pyr directors talked about the case at a table.  Absolutely nothing of importance to an average shareholder.  If it was material news, it would be released by the company. Delousio just wants to feel he has some importance or relevance in the matter, he is merely a spectator.   NOT a legal advisor of ANY SORT. The company will inform shareholders of material news through ...more  
Comment by Thinkbigsti69 on May 11, 2024 3:34pm
Great post Holdrrrr.
Comment by dalesio_98 on May 11, 2024 3:23pm
Nrewsday101, Thank you for sharing your opinion. You, like others, don't see past your nose. With rose colored glasses at that. Perhaps, if you view, read the document, you'll understand the relevance and my questioning the same. If not, life goes on. Good luck to All!
Comment by Holdrrrr on May 11, 2024 2:28pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by dalesio_98 on May 11, 2024 2:42pm
You promise. I will be back when the absurdity gets out of hand again. Good luck to All!
Comment by tamaracktop on May 11, 2024 2:56pm
Wednesday is going to be very exciting. 
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities