PyroGenesis Inc T.PYR

I ask you all .."Where is the justice in this?"

[Toppert1]

"As of November 11, 2024 the Investor: (i) beneficially owns and controls 67,892,941 common shares, (ii) controls 5,636,000 common shares beneficially owned by 8339856 Canada Inc. (an entity of which he is a director, executive officer and the sole shareholder), (iii) controls 403,957 common shares beneficially owned by Fiducie de Crdit Mellon Trust (a trust of which he is a trustee, executive officer and beneficiary), and (iv) controls 4,000,000 common shares beneficially owned by The 2% Solution Foundation (a registered charity of which he is a director)."

Pascali has sold 392.200 shares in the trust since November 11th.

He still owns 72,468,298 shares in 4 different entities/accounts as of yesterday.

If he were to sell every single one of those shares at just 20 cents, he would still scorf an additional $14,493,659 for his "contribution" to this company.


 " Thanks for supporting me everybody.  See ya. "

If I were you, I'd be mad as hell.

I don't even own this,  and it upsets Me.

That much should be obvious by now.

[Toppert1]

Notice the "charity" reportedly has 4 million shares. They don't have to report, nevertheless that figure looks "off" to me. Might be worth investigating.

[TOCKY8008]

TopTop, First off, you're not upset, you're upsetting..., while being funny. Boy do you spin. Second, the 2% Solution Foundation charity do report to the SEDI. Last shares donation by Peter, to it,  was  2022-12-28   2 Millions shares. You can check it with your Stogiethebest's handle account, if you're not barred  there!!!. The major thing, that looks

[Toppert1]

YOU ARE WRONG.  THE 2% SOLUTION DOES NOT REPORT TO SEDI. PETER MUST REPORT HIS CONTIBUTIONS TO THE 2% SOLUTION BECAUSE HE OWNS MORE THAN 10% OF PYROGENESIS.  ONCE THEY'VE BEEN TRANSFERRED, THE 2% SOLUTION DOES NOT REPORT BECAUSE THEY DON'T OWN MORE THAN 10%. Know what you're talking about before you spout off. Some posters on this boards' sole purpose seems to be to

[TOCKY8008]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[Toppert1]

Hahahahaha   The transaction you referred  to was reported by Peter.  The foundation now owns the stock, he doesn't.  If he claimed ownership, it would be illegal. He's declared that he's "gutted it". You can't "gift" to yourself. If he did claimed ownership after donating it, it would be a flagrant and gross violation. Find just

[TOCKY8008]

You had my post removed for bullying, aaawh, poor... Here it is without... Almost all in caps ,really!!! Did I hit a nerve? Peter has control over the foundation,so the foundation has to report it. Otherwise it would not be included in the press release you quoted. There is nothing to be "investigated". Again your posts look like tiny top. TOCKY8008

[Toppert1]

I don't have to check it, I remember it.