Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Quarterhill Inc T.QTRH

Alternate Symbol(s):  QTRHF | T.QTRH.DB

Quarterhill Inc. is a Canada-based company, which is engaged in providing of tolling and enforcement solutions in the intelligent transportation system (ITS) industry. The Company is focused on the acquisition, management and growth of companies that provide integrated, tolling and mobility systems and solutions to the ITS industry as well as its adjacent markets. The Company’s solutions... see more

TSX:QTRH - Post Discussion

Quarterhill Inc > Canaccord on Q2/21
View:
Post by cabbieJBJ on Aug 06, 2021 9:38am

Canaccord on Q2/21

Waiting on WiLAN, M&A to kickstart shares

Investment Recommendation

Quarterhill announced Q2 results that came in well below expectations as the volatile WiLAN business underwhelmed. IRD, despite the recent acquisitions of VDS and Sensor Line, also fell short of our model. With that said, both are expected to rebound in H2. We maintain a SPECULATIVE BUY rating in advance of this rebound. We await the deployment of QTRH’s ~$123M cash on hand on sizable M&A targets in support of management goal of deploying $400M by 2025, and potentially positive developments from its Apple suit and upcoming litigations with Amazon and Micron. We have made reductions to our forecast reflecting a more conservative IRD outlook but with a quick recovery modelled for WiLAN. With the roll forward in our updated sum-of-the-parts analysis, our target price remains at $3.00.

Investment Highlights

• Q2 a miss on weak WiLAN results. Revenue of $18.9M (CG $35.8M; Street $31.7M) and EBITDA -$3.0M (CG +$3.0M; Street +$5.7M) was driven largely by fewer licenses closed by WiLAN during the quarter. See our earlier note here.

• Segmented outlook:
WiLAN: Q2 was impacted by the volatile nature of finalizing prospective licensees and securing court dates. Management expects a stronger H2/21 supported by its pipeline of numerous deals (including several announced in recent weeks), suggesting “significant” cash flow for the full year and in line with previous years.
IRD: Management continues to point to post-acquisition synergies, noting some revenue and cost savings have already been realized. Sensor Line has performed as expected and has benefitted from synergies with VDS to pursue two multi-million dollar deals for which it would otherwise not be competitive. The companies are working together on several opportunities in Europe where they had no previous coverage.

M&A focus increasingly on larger potential deals. Quarterhill closed Q2 with ~ $123M in cash. Management reiterated its target to deploy up to $400M on M&A over the next five years, which could layer up to $300M in revenue and $50M in EBITDA. Management noted it could close several more deals by the end of 2021 including the potential for a more sizable transaction. The company expects such large deals would likely be platform plays to create new inroads within adjacent ITS segments.

Apple and other litigation updates: Management noted it could imminently receive a date for its oral hearing with Apple, which is expected to be conducted sometime between Fall 2021 and Spring 2022. The company also noted an upcoming trial date with Amazon in November regarding voice-activated assistance technology and another with Micron expected in 2022.

Model modifications: We have scaled back our IRD growth outlook over the balance of our forecast to 2022, but with a short-term offset as we expect a sharper recovery in the WiLAN business in H2/21. We now forecast 2021E revenue of $110.2M (from $134.6M; Street $125.8M) and EBITDA of $2.9M (from $9.2M; Street $17.5M), and 2022E revenue of $142.9M (from $158.8M; Street $148.2M) and EBITDA of $11.3M (from $13.4M; Street $23.5M). We note the wide variance in 2021 EBITDA expectations reflect the ongoing volatility in the WiLAN business.

Valuation

Our $3.00 target price is driven by ~10x EBITDA for IRD and ~6x for WiLAN. We also include prospective cash from the significant Apple win (US$109M less assumed 30% fees and at an 85% weighting to reflect time value and risk) and deduct 10x corporate overhead costs.
Comment by astutein on Aug 06, 2021 10:28am
Cabbie-  although it is nice to see Canaccord valuation is pricing in a Apple win to arrive at $3.00 valuation, In my  opinion, the potential Apple win at 109 reflects a true value of win forthe following reasons: The 109 decision reflects only up to Apple 7 and does not include post apple7 figures which was in Judges decision and agreed to by Apple to supply updated figures.  ...more  
Comment by Capharnaum on Aug 06, 2021 10:33am
Deducting 10x corporate overhead is also harsh.
Comment by cabbieJBJ on Aug 06, 2021 11:50am
agree Capharnaum.  A weighted average of IRD/Wilan would eb more reasonable.
Comment by ChiChi3 on Aug 06, 2021 12:12pm
My question is 10x what?  The combined EBITDA of Wilan and IRD?   If so, we might as well close up shop now because we can't be profitable!  This analyst doesn't seem to understand how to value a company.  Sure deduct some expense for the corporate part of the business but that's pretty small.  If you include the Apple proceeds, even discounted as he does, we ...more  
Comment by cabbieJBJ on Aug 06, 2021 1:25pm
Chi, Please let the board know of CIBC's assessment.   The theory behind the 10X is that the corporate costs should be deducted from the operating subs' results.  That is the correct interpreation in applying the corporate overhead.  However, Canaccord gives IRD has a mutiple of 10X and Wilan a multiple of 6X, my point was that they should apply a weighted average ...more  
Comment by Capharnaum on Aug 06, 2021 3:00pm
I still think it's too harsh. On Cannacord's measure, Iteris would be valued around $155M USD when the market cap is at $255M USD.
Comment by ChiChi3 on Aug 07, 2021 3:18pm
I`d share if I had any analyst reports - sorry Cabbie. I get that there will be corporate overhead but even if you give it a weighted average of the EBITDA of the subsids, which I agree makes more sense, it still  seems to me that this means all the EBITDA gets eaten up by corporate overhead.  So even though Quarterhill has been cash flow positive the last few years, Canaccord is saying ...more  
Comment by Capharnaum on Aug 07, 2021 3:55pm
Outside of Apple's settlement, they value IRD + Wilan at around $140M in a $3 scenario. Also, yearly average EBITDA of Wilan, outside the Apple settlement, should be around $25M and cover the corporate overhead. As I've said, applying the same net revenues minus overhead x 10 would put the value of Iteris around $150M USD (their net results after overhead is around $15M) which is over ...more  
Comment by astutein on Aug 06, 2021 10:38am
cabbie- Correction -Potential Apple win at 109 should read DOES NOT REFLECT TRUE VALUE.
Comment by cabbieJBJ on Aug 06, 2021 1:10pm
Astutein, I think Canaccord's assessment of a positive outcome v. Apple is a bit simplistic.  Even taking their number of USD $109M (CAD $136M) and accepting their estimate of 30% to McKool, which I think is high (more later), the return is CAD $0.85/share and QTRH is trading in the $2.30 range Where I think Canaccord is off: Apple has already stipulated that infringing, non ...more  
Comment by Justhalffull on Aug 06, 2021 1:30pm
I believe McCool and Virnetx had a retainer agreement.  I believe I read a few years ago that aMcCool' contract with With-Lan was on a contingency basis, so would no doubt be a higher % fee as they may get nothing if they did not win.