Post by
cabbieJBJ on Aug 11, 2021 12:09pm
IPA v. Amazon games
It seems that Judge Andrews has taken a very dim view of Amazon's and IPA's mass redactions. Amazon is docs 357 and 360 - 362. IPA is docs 363 - 367.
DOC 368
ORAL ORDER: The redacted filings (D.I. 357, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, and 367) are REJECTED because parts of them are redacted in their entirety. Absent a compelling reason, supported by a statement under oath by a party, redactions in their entirety are impermissible; redactions must be done so as to redact the least possible amount of the materials submitted. Failure to make a good faith attempt at such redactions may result in sanctions, the most common of which would be simply unsealing the entire filing. Redacting in its entirety a document that contains publicly available materials is prima facie evidence of bad faith. Revised redacted filings are DUE within five business days. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/9/2021.
Comment by
cabbieJBJ on Aug 11, 2021 12:31pm
The issue here is infringement and validity: IPA's docs relate to Amazon's doc 281, a motion for summary judgement that their products do not infringe. Amazon's docs relate to IPA's doc 288, a motion for summary judgement that it's IP in not invalid. Pre-trial dance?
Comment by
Windsor123 on Aug 11, 2021 6:27pm
Thanks for posting cabbieJBJ.
Comment by
checkup on Aug 11, 2021 3:38pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy