Quarterhill Inc T.QTRH

FYI = Rating Update copied from TDWBDI ;>O

[TimeBuilder]

WORTH AREPEAT   IMO

Ratings change for Jul. 24, 2022 - Jul. 30, 2022

Date

Symbol

Brokerage

Analyst Name

Analyst Ranking out of 7,947

Current Rating

Current Target

24 Jul. 2022

QTRH

M Partners

Nicholas Cortellucci

5,994

BUY

$4.50 ??

[TimeBuilder]

  Quarterhill Inc TSX:QTRHCanadaView on OTCQX International Search Name or SymbolSearch As of 2022-07-25 at 04:39:28 PM ET Refresh Print   Collapse Quote Bar LAST PRICE 2.1300

[v_guerriero]

M Partners is getting ready to issue more securities.  You need to read the note 6 that they are compensated for investment banking services.   The debentures tell you everything you need to know.  A new all time low at 94.74 today. Sometimes you see a flurry of news releases to try and stoke demand to sell stock or debentures. Perhaps getting ready to finance a dilutive

[mrmoribund]

VG, I'm confused by your post. Which note 6 are you talking about? In what document? I'm fine to keep an open mind to the possibility that you might be right. But I seem to need help to see how you got to this conclusion (or even hypothesis).

[v_guerriero]

In the M partners analyst report.  They have to disclose their conflicts.   Note 6 says: "6. M Partners provided investment banking services for the company during the 12 months preceding the publication of the research" This means:  don't believe anything we write because our job is to sell securities, not to give you accurate research.  

[cabbieJBJ]

What a schmuck!  So you quote Canaccord as gospel and they have the same disclaimner.  Again, what a schmuck.

[monte8]

That's "Canacrap", Thank you!

[v_guerriero]

The M Partners one is very typical.  Don't bite the hand that feeds you. Cannacord moving to a hold and cutting the target to $2.50.  They bit the hand that feeds them.  That is very rare and says a lot.  

[cabbieJBJ]

USA-based growth and RJ/CIBC have relegated Canaccord to the sidelines, Canaccord got a pittance share of the debenture deal.  Additionally, when the Quarterhill action moves south, Canaccord is not significant enough player there.  RJ and CIBC are. You are still a schmuck.  Note 6 is boilerplate and suggests nothing that you were touting.

[v_guerriero]

Here is a fact.  If you listened to me and sold at 2.60, you would have more money in your pocket.  The same is true of listening to the Cannacord report.   Remember:  Every day above $2.00 is a gift.  The Watchmaker thought so, too.  

[mrmoribund]

A shining example of hindsight-based "analysis." Shopify fell today, Tuesday. Why didn't you sell it on Monday? I told you to sell Shopify. I never believed in it. I knew all along there was something wrong with it.

[astutein]

V-G Your days of predicting a downward drop to $ 1.10 are over.  your posts are now meaningless. a bit of advice.   Take advantage of $2.10 in your short  POSITION and buyback all you can before you loose all of your profits when you started selling  at $2.60. Your shorts are about to get soiled and turning red. V-G YOU WILL HAVE MONEY IN YOUR POCKET. LAST CHANCE

[cabbieJBJ]

NEWS FLASH ASTUTEIN... weegee's posts have been meaningless for some time.  He fell off the edge of the world when he called $15 for QTRH in Q4-21. Now he's just a schmuck.

[v_guerriero]

Cabbie, You've had to resort to name calling and smearing as the only rationale left.   You may not like what I say.  But it is grounded in fact.   The facts are: - Quarterhill paid a 140% premium or $100M more that align capital did the year before for ETC.   - The auditors highlighted a key issue is the goodwill on the books for the ETC acquisition.  

[cabbieJBJ]

Virtually nothing you say weegee is grounded in fact - mostly your self inflated opinion.  However, your mis-use of note 6 in the M Partners upgrade to infer something negative is happening (i.e. a dilutive equity raise) was particularily egregious and earned you the adjective schmuck. 

[Buyreallow]

Schmuck is a noun, not an adjective.

[cabbieJBJ]

You are correct buyreallow. Schmuck is a noun. Thx for the correction. Schmuck is a wonderfully descriptive noun.

[Buyreallow]

In "big schmuck", big would be an adjective.  Same for "little" schmuck.  Which is it?

[cabbieJBJ]

I'm not looking for an adjective any more buyreallow.  I should have said noun.  Schmuck is perfectly perfectly fine by itself.  Obviously I have failed English Grammar 101; however, I believe I deserve an A+ in creative writing.  Schmuck is the desired and appropriate depiction. Schmuck is a kind of absolute word.  Free to add an adjective if you wish.

[v_guerriero]

What do you call the people that added another 137k shares short in the last two weeks?  Representing 25% of the trades. Why are the debentures trading at all time lows?  

[astutein]

v-g   last chance tomorrow to cover your short position at $ 2.17.  Another day or two & you could  could be wiped  out of all your profits.  Shortssqueeze coming any day.

[checkup]

You have excellent precognitive ability   :)   Stock up to 2.25 +3.68%  

[checkup]

Shoot....i just hexxed QTRH....down to 2.14 

[cabbieJBJ]

Relax checkup.  It's early in the trading day.  Volume is up and yesterday's gains have held.  Weegee is still calculating the gain/loss on the 137M shares shorted in the past 2 weeks that he referenced in his Post# 34855757.

[cabbieJBJ]

Thanks Astutein.   Facinating, isn't it, that weegee hasn't posted to brag how successful the 137M share short has been.

[redcoats]

If he'd used "schmuck off", what would that have been?

[cabbieJBJ]

Nice day today redcoats. It would be a verb, but that's improper use.  Let's just leave it at schmuck since it fits.