Quarterhill Inc T.QTRH

Nasdaq listing?

[Tcad123]

I can see this coming soon...

[Socrates1]

Not a good idea until company can demonstrate profitability, ebifta improvement and a CEO for at least one year, me think.... hopefully the new CEO will last longer than that? New board MUST demonstrate competency and successful achievement of goals set! Looks to me market thinks similarly? WILAN sale got us 1 cent! Nobody cared or care until the soap opera of musical chairs ends! Imo.....

[Homework]

The market doesn't work that way?? The market will anticipate in advance of a stronger ETC performance. The stock will climb ahead of that.......Once the show me moment comes and surpass those expectations the stock continues t climb and vice versa. The stock can languish for years until it doesn't due to material change in growth of profits and revenue......... Microsoft did nothing

[100mill]

Quarterhill applying for a Nasdaq listing before they are profitable would be silly, They've just done everything they can to cut expenses. Applying to Nasdq would be an unnecessary expense. Maybe in 2025 it will make sense and if they do it, they may want to go all in by moving from TSE to Nasdaq and moving the head office from Toronto to the U.S.

[cabbieJBJ]

No way with the current profitability and current structure. Maybe down the line. It could be a year, but I'm thinking less, as I agree the market anticipates performance.  August will be the first opportunity. 

[mrmoribund]

I believe the head office is already in Texas. 100mill, I agree that seeking a Nasdaq listing now would make no sense. I'm not sure if it would send me into a state of open revolt. But pretty close. Get to a quarter where they have earnings of a penny a share. That's what the market will care about. And it won't matter a hoot so long as they're listed on a decent exchange

[maxxprophet]

https://www.quarterhill.com/investor-contacts/default.aspx

[cabbieJBJ]

Correct 100mill and mrmoribund - the head office is effectively in the USA.  Once there is credible evidence that the profitability issue is being corrected, dual listing and official HO announcements will be made.  Alternatively, a merger/acquisition of a currently listed company could come into play. But first and formoat, the profitability situation must show significant tangible

[mrmoribund]

Actually, let me offer a qualifying comment to my previous post. While, yes, it will be a key milestone when the company produces an actual quarterly profit, you don't want to have that first quarterly profit become the imperative that trumps every other consideration. So, for example, it would likely be easy to get to profitability soon enough by simply declining to take on any new tolling

[cabbieJBJ]

As an ITS stand alone, it's time to stand up. Great post mrmoribund. 

[cabbieJBJ]

I need to add that IMO investor interest must, underline MUST, come come from stateside.

[mrmoribund]

You don't need a US listing to get US investor interest. Regardless, you can just buy QTRHF right now. What you need to get US investor interest is a compelling story. Note we didn't need a US listing to get Rusty Lewis or Chuck Myers. Cabbie, I'll agree to a US listing if you agree to pay all the US listing costs. You're a good guy and we're 99% on the same side but I am

[Capharnaum]

For a "small-cap" like QTRH, I don't think the Nasdaq offers a ton of value. There's a lot of shorting on the Nasdaq for dual-listed companies. It might make more sense to just move completely to the Nasdaq in the future. From my experience watching companies go to the Nasdaq, I don't think a Nasdaq listing would increase the share price.

[cabbieJBJ]

Mrmoribund, you're assuming that I advocate for a US listing for the sake of having one.  That's rediculous!  A compelling story needs to accompany it.  As far as Lewis and Myers are concerned, I believe they are there to  provide ITS chops and market credibility to US investors, when the time is right.  I also believe that the next two BoD appointments (CEO and