Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Rogers Communications Ord Shs Class A T.RCI.A

Alternate Symbol(s):  RCI | T.RCI.B | RCIAF

Rogers Communications Inc. is a wireless, cable, and media company. The Company provides connectivity and entertainment to Canadian consumers and businesses across the country. The Company also has a portfolio of media properties, which includes sports media and entertainment, television and radio broadcasting properties, multi-platform televised and online shopping and digital media. Its... see more

TSX:RCI.A - Post Discussion

Rogers Communications Ord Shs Class A > Wasn't it the Founders wishes that the Chairman of the
View:
Post by RagingBull3 on Nov 02, 2021 1:08pm

Wasn't it the Founders wishes that the Chairman of the

Control Trust to represent shareholders?    If so, then I would say that the company move to remove Edward as Chairman of Rogers without Shareholders approval (vote) is invalid if the company is saying that removal of other board members is invalid without shareholder approval. 

Company and board members basically went against 97% of the shareholders in their attempt to remove Edward as Chairman of Rogers.    As such, it's not Edward that went against the founders wishes, but the company and mother and others when they tried to remove Edwards as Chairman.

Nothing Wrong with Edward seeking to replace the CEO.   Nothing Wrong with Board members Voting Edwards motion down.    That's one of the jobs Board members are tasked to do!!!  

Where the "problem" started was when the mother and others "removed" the Chairman, who represents 97% of the votes!!!!   

All just my opinion/view/thinking/guessing/understanding
Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities