RMP ENERGY INC T.RMP

He was forced out

[MustangMatt]

No doubt in my mind, question is what next, the market doe not seem to like this new uncertainty.  However, longer term looks things are shaking up, cheers Matthew

[Seppelt]

I am not sure he was forced out, Mustang. But if that's the case, why not to force the chairman and the entire board to retire as well. This is a tightly knit team without major additions to the board since 2011. I doubt, a new board member can stir up things that easy. The rest of the gang, including the Chairman and CEO, could argue that 7.5% doesn't buy you a business, make an offer

[Seppelt]

Just want to add a few definitions of Shareholder Friendly Management:   - A Board of Directors Putting the Needs of Stockholders Ahead of the Wants of Executives - Paying Limited and Reasonable Stock Option and Executive Compensation - Settling for Nothing Less Than Open and Honest Communication   I am a shareholder (the total # of shares on 3 accounts is six digits), but I

[baranja]

I am looking at their  web site design,.. so old and outdated. A lemonade stand run by two grade 1 girls could be better represented then this. RMP is positive in my books, but they will need to do some work. Consider 2017 to be restructuring and reorganising year. It took CKE at least a year to complete all of that and probably   they will be ready for run after March. RMP is O.K. now

[MustangMatt]

I think you just answered the question Seppelt.  My best guess as to why the whole board wasn't replaced, and it is just a guess, is that John fell on his sword for the rest of the team.   The new "activist"  does not have the votes on his own true, however, my guess is he has some other shareholders who want management changes too. This could have been the best way

[ppp]

Wow you guys are seeing the light. I wouldn't touch this company until at least half of the directors are gone.