Post by
soundandfury on Nov 09, 2021 11:03am
Re: Hedges
That is exactly correct........imo sgy debt covenents were breached and sgy debt holders literally held sgy continued existence in their hands..............if this is correct then i do feel that shareholders should have been told ...........i believe that the debt covenent that was breached was total assets/ total liabilities .....must never fall below 1: 1 ratio..........i also believe that even if the banks did not foreclose the convertible debenture holders still could have demanded their money 70 million (which would have resulted in bankruptcy)
Comment by
ppp on Nov 09, 2021 11:40am
Question is, what about the other 50 mil. ARO? or is paul being conservative, to blow the results out of the water at the end of 22, Very interesting story IMO.