Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Skeena Resources Ltd T.SKE

Alternate Symbol(s):  SKE

Skeena Resources Limited is a precious metals developer that is focused on advancing the Eskay Creek Gold-Silver Project, a past producing mine located in the Golden Triangle in British Columbia, Canada. Eskay Creek represents one of the highest-grade and lowest cost open-pit precious metals mines in the world, with substantial silver by-product production. It also owns the past-producing Snip... see more

TSX:SKE - Post Discussion

View:
Post by templetooth2 on Sep 17, 2022 3:14pm

Royalty

Obviously, my arithmetic or rather my reasoning was wrong in my earlier post. That's what happens when you let Robert Mondavi help you compose something.
So, admittedly, a royalty of half a percent right off the top is substantially more valuable than a straight economic interest. I've never delved into royalties or royalty companies so I can't say if this $17.5 million is reasonable or not. But as pointed out by Angelique, Franco does this for a living and they think it's worth more. Fine, okay.

What gets my goat is issuing stock at a meagre $6 to finance this. 5 million new shares on top of the 70 million previously, is 7.14% dilution. That, in my opinion, is TERRIBLE.
Comment by metalhead666 on Sep 17, 2022 3:59pm
No one likes dilution but this is a good move and had to be done. As I understand it a NSR is right off the top minus smelter and transportation costs and would go on for the life of the project.  To not buy this back would cost us a lot in the long run so a little dilution now to gain a lot more later is how it seems. I'm good with it now.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities