Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Skeena Resources Ltd T.SKE

Alternate Symbol(s):  SKE

Skeena Resources Limited is a Canadian mining exploration and development company. The Company is focused on revitalizing the Eskay Creek and Snip Projects, two past-producing mines located in Tahltan Territory in the Golden Triangle of northwest British Columbia, Canada. The Eskay Creek portal consists of eight mineral leases, two surface leases and various unpatented mining claims totaling 6... see more

TSX:SKE - Post Discussion

Skeena Resources Ltd > Osisko - Skeena
View:
Post by templetooth2 on Aug 12, 2024 2:04pm

Osisko - Skeena

To figure the value of the Osisko deal, you should do a thought experiment. Namely, what did Goldfields own yesterday, (50% of Windfall but consider they hadn't yet paid 2nd tranche of $300 million) versus what do they own today (100% of Osisko). 

Per the original deal, OSK and GFI were to share $250 million in pre-construction expense and $789 capex. Now that is all borne by GFI. So yes, the deal is worth somewhat more than headline $2.16 B but no, it's not double. 

I would agree with lumpy that takeovers are completely unpredictable, but the Osisko deal really highlights what an industry player is willing to pay for a quality asset. If you only ascribe 50% value to Osisko's inferred resources, these 2 companies are very similar in terms of resources and time frame to production.
Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities