Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Slate Office REIT 9 00 Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Debentures Exp 28 Feb 2026 T.SOT.DB.B


Primary Symbol: T.SOT.DB Alternate Symbol(s):  SLTTF | T.SOT.UN | T.SOT.DB.A

Slate Office REIT (the REIT) is a Canada-based global owner and operator of workplace real estate. The REIT is an unincorporated, open-ended real estate investment trust. The REIT owns interests in and operates a portfolio of real estate assets in North America and Europe. The REIT's portfolio is primarily comprised of government and credit tenants. The REIT's portfolio consists of... see more

TSX:SOT.DB - Post Discussion

View:
Post by pennydredful on Nov 16, 2024 2:27pm

They may want to slim down as much as possible

Prior   to  the   recap , so   bond  holders  and  unit  holders buy  in to  it.  the    going  forward   entity needs to have  their  ducks  in  a row  with  no  defaulting  mortgages  outstanding.
Comment by pennylane101 on Nov 17, 2024 10:23am
Any slimming down would involve Armoyan and the Welch brothers taking a hit too.  
Comment by Tree2tree on Nov 17, 2024 7:43pm
Not sure why anybody would 'take a hit', if the slimming down involves reducing assets and debts in roughly the same proportions.  Yes it would reduce the overall size of the company, and reduce the cost of the recapitalization.
Comment by pennylane101 on Nov 17, 2024 8:04pm
Hey Tree, I absolutely agree. Why then would bond holders and unit holders have to buy into it?   Here is PennyD's statement:  "Prior   to  the   recap , so   bond  holders  and  unit  holders buy  in to  it."    
Comment by Tree2tree on Nov 18, 2024 9:07am
My understanding:   - A buyout of the company as a whole (leaving debentures intact) would only require a vote of common shareholders.   - A highly dilutive financing by issuing new common shares might require a vote of common shareholers.   - A vote of debenture holders would be required in any arrangement where the conditions of the debentures are modified (eg including partial ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities