Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Sulliden Gold Corporation Ltd T.SUE.WT

TSX:SUE.WT - Post Discussion

Sulliden Gold Corporation Ltd > feasibility study looks ok?
View:
Post by thedave2006 on Sep 26, 2012 8:55am

feasibility study looks ok?

Sulliden Announces Results of Shahuindo Feasibility Study

RELATED QUOTES

Symbol Price Change
SDDDF 1.281

TORONTO, Sept. 26, 2012 /CNW/ - Sulliden Gold Corporation Ltd. ("Sulliden", or the "Company") (TSX:SUE.TO - News) (BVL:SUE.TO - News) (OTCQX:SDDDF - News) announces the results of a positive Feasibility Study by Kappes, Cassiday & Associates and Mine Development Associates to develop the epithermal gold and silver deposit located on its 100% owned Shahuindo property in Peru.

Highlights of the Feasibility Study 1, 2:

  • Pre-production capital costs of $131.8 million3
  • 10,000 tonnes per day operation producing 87,700 oz of gold equivalent per annum4
  • Pre Tax Internal Rate of Return of 52.2%
  • After Tax Internal Rate of Return of 37.8%
  • Total cash operating costs of $552/oz gold 5
  • LOM average gold grade of 0.84 g/t and average silver grade of 9.50 g/t

The Feasibility Study demonstrates a straightforward mining project including a shallow open pit mine with a heap leach and a conventional carbon adsorption (Adsorption-Desorption-Recovery (ADR) plant) processing plant for precious metal recovery. The project requires initial capital of $131.8 million that will support a mining rate of 3.65 million tonnes per year, producing gold at an average cash cost of $552 per ounce and average annual production of 87,700 gold equivalent ounces. Highlights of the project performance are summarized in Table 1.

The mining scenario presented in the Feasibility Study considers only approximately 40% of the gold ounces from the total oxide mineral resource (see Mineral Resource press release from September 5, 2012). Although the mineral resources currently outlined on the property could support a significantly higher mining rate and production profile, it is the Company's preference to build a low capital cost and smaller footprint operation. This initial mining scenario will act as a foundation for future production growth and will also provide the Company with the opportunity to fund future expansions from internally generated cash flow.

Peter Tagliamonte, President and CEO, commented "The completion of the Feasibility Study marks an important milestone towards our goal of becoming a gold producer. We are pleased to be able to deliver an initial project study with modestly sized capital costs that we believe should provide faster cash flow generation, expeditious permitting, and a shorter construction schedule. Future growth is anticipated once in production and we plan to fund this expansion from internal cash flows."

Comment by Teatimenow on Sep 26, 2012 9:39am
dissapointing me thinks, espacially in comparison with other projects at same stage. Marketcap 300million , if they would try to finance this stage one development 100% equity it would be 320million basic. bottom line: - higher than estimated cash costs - lower than even low case estmated production (87k AuEQ is not great) - base case uses a rel high Gold price, compared to other recently released ...more  
Comment by safi61 on Sep 26, 2012 2:56pm
More than 7 M shares (and counting...) sold in just 2 days (close to 3% of shares out) is not a good sign. Nope.
Comment by MrHjulben on Sep 26, 2012 4:01pm
  "- lower than even low case estmated production (87k AuEQ is not great)"   To start at 87k AuEQ rate is a deliberate choice made by management, now they have a smaller resource with higher grade and once the operation increases in ton the grades will come down but the increased production will probably keep cash costs around flat from today. A small capex can be handled ...more  
Comment by safi61 on Sep 26, 2012 4:44pm
Not for our friend Otto, no señor.https://incakolanews.blogspot.com/2012/09/mo-sulliden-sueto-can-we-be-clear-on.html
Comment by safi61 on Sep 26, 2012 4:44pm
Not for our friend Otto, no señor.https://incakolanews.blogspot.com/2012/09/mo-sulliden-sueto-can-we-be-clear-on.html
Comment by ccrfmac on Sep 26, 2012 5:12pm
Yes, Shahuindo is in Cajamarca, but it is not the same as Conga. The problem in Cajamarca is not with all mining activities, but with Yanacocha...Gregorio Santos, Cajamarca's regional president, mentioned Sulliden as "one mining company which is doing business well and taking care of the environment".  we will see if Shahuindo follows the successful path of Rio Alto. Also, Peter ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities