Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Sernova Corp T.SVA

Alternate Symbol(s):  SEOVF

Sernova Corp. is a Canada-based clinical-stage biotechnology company, which is developing therapeutic cell technologies for chronic diseases, including insulin-dependent diabetes, thyroid disease, and blood disorders that include hemophilia A. The Company is focused on developing a functional cure for insulin-dependent diabetes with its therapeutic cell technology, the Cell Pouch System, a... see more

TSX:SVA - Post Discussion

Sernova Corp > Just Wondering II
View:
Post by donkeyfeathers on Jan 28, 2021 4:49pm

Just Wondering II

Hey Red,

I don’t think we’d be changing the "auction effect” of Pharma’s eventual offers (plural) if it was announced that a compensatory aspect to these new collaborations existed.  Something along the lines of “there is a net positive valuation to the company, as a result of these collaboration agreements” if that is the case.  That shows nothing to potential suitors, and does provide material information to investors (legacy and potential) now.  I’m not sure who vets these NR’s that I think Dominic writes, and maybe the nature of these collaborations does not include either a cost or profit to SVA shareholders.  But as a shareholder who has a history with the share value behaviour post announcements, I think there is info that can be provided that doesn’t risk company strategy, while coloring in some of the money-in, money-out piece. 
As far as Rixpix observation goes, the (eventual) announcement that insulin free and anti-rejection free have both been confirmed, across patients, may or may not happen after a take out offer has been submitted.  Again, the board’s responsibility to shareholders is to get full valuation for our patience.  And the take out bids will be much higher if both the current study and these new collaborations prove the islets work and there is no need for anti-rejection drugs.  The rest is just filler which won’t boost the daily price variations very much.  I just don't want to try and time that "windfall" announcement.
DF

Comment by BioTeck on Jan 28, 2021 4:57pm
How much money were you expecting Donkey? Divide that number by the number of shares outstanding and I bet the amount is negligable. Sernova doesn't have what it takes to take this to the finish line themselves, they need partners and they just signed 2 of them. This won't cost sernova anything and they will gain experience and intelectual property and possibly open doors to many  ...more  
Comment by donkeyfeathers on Jan 28, 2021 5:13pm
I think the only things I've call out were your "weird" math applications, and an inability to be civil.  But because you were civil, I will cut you some room, but only briefly.  No, the information they could provide would not be significant from a dollar amount (how ever you define that), but it would tell shareholders a little more about how the relationship between SVA ...more  
Comment by BioTeck on Jan 28, 2021 6:37pm
Try calling the company and asking. You will probably get the answers you are looking for.
Comment by rixpix on Jan 28, 2021 5:59pm
Well said, DF.  On another note, could you please post in a larger font next time? I had to squint reading, even wearing my reading glasses.  :)
Comment by Redbaron2211 on Jan 28, 2021 7:54pm
Agree DF more details would be appreciated but my take is this NR isn't for investors.  Feels like it's more tactical, not to be patronizing but I think about it like buying a home.  If it's a slow market and you know you're the only one looking, you are going to sit back and think about it.  If the realtor tells you there is alot of interest and potential ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities