Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Theratechnologies Inc T.TH

Alternate Symbol(s):  THTX

Theratechnologies Inc. is a Canada-based clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company. The Company is focused on the development and commercialization of therapies addressing unmet medical needs. It markets prescription products for people with human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) in the United States. The Company's research pipeline focuses on specialized therapies addressing unmet medical needs... see more

TSX:TH - Post Discussion

Theratechnologies Inc > New Corporate Presentation is up
View:
Post by SPCEO1 on Mar 05, 2021 1:48pm

New Corporate Presentation is up

https://www.theratech.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Corporate-Presentation_Theratehnologies_March-2021.pdf
Comment by scarlet1967 on Mar 05, 2021 2:15pm
For R&D looking through it quickly they added the fast track for PDC and study may proceed for both protocols. The commercializing strategies seems to have few new additions, note they are saying the Trogarzo market opportunity could be as much as US! “New Go-to-Market Strategy Underpinned by Sales Force Reorganization and Targeted Patient / Prescriber Education. Leverage existing ...more  
Comment by Spartrap on Mar 05, 2021 2:30pm
Was it known that the Trogarzo's IM study is to be conducted by Thera? Wonder how much this is going to cost, on top of the two other european trog studies.. (ouch)
Comment by scarlet1967 on Mar 05, 2021 2:46pm
As per mentioned by SPCEO the monthly administration trial's cost will be carried by both companies, not sure about biweekly l am not even sure they do biweekly and just go with monthly. But it seems the cost to TH is on a pro forma basis directly related to percentage of sales which is good.
Comment by SPCEO1 on Mar 05, 2021 2:47pm
Where did you see that TH is footing the bill for the IM Trogarzo trial?
Comment by Spartrap on Mar 05, 2021 3:00pm
Well I assumed "conducted" (footnotes on page 6 and 7) meant TH is footing the bill. Maybe not, or maybe costs are shared..but then wouldn't the corporate document make that unambiguous?
Comment by qwerty22 on Mar 05, 2021 3:04pm
Is this an efficacy study or are they just showing bio-equivalence type studies, showing IM has same pharmaco profile as IV?
Comment by palinc2000 on Mar 05, 2021 3:41pm
I have learned from SPCEO to read between the lines,So in reading between the lines I think they want the reader to conclude that  the 75-100 Hiv  patients cohort in the Nash trial has a good chance of success and that alone would  represent a major market opportunity,,,, I really enjoy reading their confidence level in getting substantial growth in sales of existing product
Comment by palinc2000 on Mar 05, 2021 4:00pm
How about a label expansion for Nash Hiv patients 18 mos into the trial after an interim review by DSMB   ,,,,,
Comment by SPCEO1 on Mar 05, 2021 4:35pm
They are going for full approval after 18 months of data - right? I will take the HIV NASH label as soon as they are willing to give it. The sooner the better from the patient's perspective. 
Comment by palinc2000 on Mar 05, 2021 5:49pm
 You mean 18 mos after full enrolment? I mean 18 mos  or so after start ot the trial when DSMB looks at interim redults for safety and efficacy
Comment by SPCEO1 on Mar 05, 2021 9:21pm
Comment by SPCEO1 on Mar 05, 2021 9:22pm
That works for me - let's hope the FDA sees it the same way.
Comment by Spartrap on Mar 05, 2021 3:50pm
Most certainly the latter. Those studies need around 20 to 30 patients to reach power I think.
Comment by SPCEO1 on Mar 05, 2021 4:57pm
That language outs the responibility for the trial on TH so it seems safe to assume they will be paying for it until we are told otherwise. It will be initeresting how this will be dealt with in terms of the marketing agreement, which I do not remember contemplatting such a development. If TH pays for the study, do they get a higher share of the revenues? Why did Taimed not want to do it? Or did ...more  
Comment by jfm1330 on Mar 05, 2021 2:42pm
At the end they wrote that they are looking for in-licensing, not the opposite. Nothing about partnerships or out-licensing, just a very general "other opportunities complementary to our business".
Comment by Wino115 on Mar 05, 2021 2:52pm
I noticed that too -- back to the old language.  I think it shows that Levesque, as a mid-fifty year old, views it that he has the time and the team to make this a much larger company on their own if they execute properly.  He has numerous colleageues I'm sure he knows that have left Pfizer over the years to smaller biotechs and some have hit massive home runs (or shall I say, won ...more