Post by
SPCEO1 on Mar 05, 2021 1:48pm
New Corporate Presentation is up
https://www.theratech.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Corporate-Presentation_Theratehnologies_March-2021.pdf
Comment by
Spartrap on Mar 05, 2021 2:30pm
Was it known that the Trogarzo's IM study is to be conducted by Thera? Wonder how much this is going to cost, on top of the two other european trog studies.. (ouch)
Comment by
scarlet1967 on Mar 05, 2021 2:46pm
As per mentioned by SPCEO the monthly administration trial's cost will be carried by both companies, not sure about biweekly l am not even sure they do biweekly and just go with monthly. But it seems the cost to TH is on a pro forma basis directly related to percentage of sales which is good.
Comment by
SPCEO1 on Mar 05, 2021 2:47pm
Where did you see that TH is footing the bill for the IM Trogarzo trial?
Comment by
Spartrap on Mar 05, 2021 3:00pm
Well I assumed "conducted" (footnotes on page 6 and 7) meant TH is footing the bill. Maybe not, or maybe costs are shared..but then wouldn't the corporate document make that unambiguous?
Comment by
qwerty22 on Mar 05, 2021 3:04pm
Is this an efficacy study or are they just showing bio-equivalence type studies, showing IM has same pharmaco profile as IV?
Comment by
palinc2000 on Mar 05, 2021 3:41pm
I have learned from SPCEO to read between the lines,So in reading between the lines I think they want the reader to conclude that the 75-100 Hiv patients cohort in the Nash trial has a good chance of success and that alone would represent a major market opportunity,,,, I really enjoy reading their confidence level in getting substantial growth in sales of existing product
Comment by
palinc2000 on Mar 05, 2021 4:00pm
How about a label expansion for Nash Hiv patients 18 mos into the trial after an interim review by DSMB ,,,,,
Comment by
SPCEO1 on Mar 05, 2021 4:35pm
They are going for full approval after 18 months of data - right? I will take the HIV NASH label as soon as they are willing to give it. The sooner the better from the patient's perspective.
Comment by
palinc2000 on Mar 05, 2021 5:49pm
You mean 18 mos after full enrolment? I mean 18 mos or so after start ot the trial when DSMB looks at interim redults for safety and efficacy
Comment by
SPCEO1 on Mar 05, 2021 9:22pm
That works for me - let's hope the FDA sees it the same way.
Comment by
Spartrap on Mar 05, 2021 3:50pm
Most certainly the latter. Those studies need around 20 to 30 patients to reach power I think.
Comment by
jfm1330 on Mar 05, 2021 2:42pm
At the end they wrote that they are looking for in-licensing, not the opposite. Nothing about partnerships or out-licensing, just a very general "other opportunities complementary to our business".