Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Theratechnologies Inc T.TH

Alternate Symbol(s):  THTX

Theratechnologies Inc. is a Canada-based clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company. The Company is focused on the development and commercialization of therapies addressing unmet medical needs. It markets prescription products for people with human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) in the United States. The Company's research pipeline focuses on specialized therapies addressing unmet medical needs... see more

TSX:TH - Post Discussion

Theratechnologies Inc > Going Forward
View:
Post by Wino115 on May 13, 2021 11:31am

Going Forward

This was the first time I can recall Paul being foreceful in a meeting on identifying the valuation gap and their need to get a fair value for the pipeline.  He even mentioned other small biotechs in that regard. Hopefully LifSci can get them up to industry best-practices in how to achieve that with what they have and explaining it properly and highlighting the valuation proposition factually. I think this boards identification of the importance of this issue is why that was discussed at all. 

If they do add the Board seat as they has said they would, I would like to think that the >20% of withheld votes for Littlejohn and Lacoste is enough of an indication that they lack full support and would step off. Self-respect and an appreciation for the small size of the company and good governance would be enough for most board members who had 20% fewer votes to step down when the Board expands and the timing is right.  Let's see what happens.
Comment by qwerty22 on May 13, 2021 11:36am
I definitely think they tried to address the issues raised here. Personally being a small shareholder Ive never gotten much from annual meetings so this one was no different. All I wanted was some small Easter Eggs about the clinical programs.
Comment by Wino115 on May 13, 2021 11:46am
I'm with you.  They're usually fairly useless except it's a platform to talk more about the important things for shareholders assembled. I was also hoping for a few updates and facts around the pipeline.  I guess the "it's going well" and "moving fast" is all we got.  I'd love to know what that moving fast refers too -- are their more patients ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities