Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Timmins Gold Corp T.TMM

"Timmins Gold Corp is engaged in acquiring, exploring, developing and operating mineral resource properties in Mexico. It owns and operates the San Francisco open pit and Ana Paula gold project in Guerrero and the Caballo Blanco gold project in Veracruz."

TSX:TMM - Post Discussion

Timmins Gold Corp > DARN! We are in for worse trouble ...
View:
Post by gbenga on Oct 06, 2015 11:21am

DARN! We are in for worse trouble ...

... CEO/Director quits;  
- TMM puts containment plan in place (= stopping current operations);
- TMM to write down assets (=abandon current operations);
- TMM goes around looking for cash (= starting all over, including bankruptcy possibility!)

What story can be worse?
Comment by Goldhound3 on Oct 06, 2015 11:42am
So are you guys saying that Tmm could drop back into the .20's or lower with this news.
Comment by gbenga on Oct 06, 2015 11:50am
I hate to say so but that's what I think.  I am already in too deep so I am holding.  But I dont think the SP can stay above .20s given these revelations (and probably more coming).  Of course one can spin it that perhaps a "white knight" would come to the rescue, but the problem is TMM itself seems to be hinting that it has no valuable assets (no profitable mines) and ...more  
Comment by Czicfwillgetermit on Oct 06, 2015 11:57am
Dreadful news indeed.  Significicant impairment charge and new CEO. And stock is only up 8%. I want more dreadful news like this daily.   More dreadful news may be the new underground tunnels at SF were only significantly adding OZs instead of phenomenally adding OZs.  We will suffer through.  
Comment by quietobserver on Oct 06, 2015 12:14pm
I get the feeling from he way the news release was worded that Mr Bragnolo was ousted by the board. Maybe this is what the market was waiting for as we are up 8.5%
Comment by gbenga on Oct 06, 2015 12:17pm
Hope springs eternal for us LONGS ... but as Gold is up today, its hard to say whether we are moving in tandem with gold generally or the market likes some of the TMM news.  Still scratching my head about "cost containment" though - to me  that could only mean abandoning operations and moving on due to lack of economically viable gold in current pits.
Comment by Czicfwillgetermit on Oct 06, 2015 12:39pm
Im not sure what they are abandoning since they have a new mine plan.  Seems to me the underground operations may be added to the mix plus new leach pads with better oversite as stated in CC to get more cost effective OZs to market.   Cost containment sounds like a blanket statement to find every penny in the couch cushions from fuel to labor to a more realistic approach to getting new ...more  
Comment by fdjens1 on Oct 06, 2015 12:51pm
Wrong. Underground mining would require mega capital to "SUDDENLY" start building underground. It means the current cheaper open pit is flailing. 
Comment by Czicfwillgetermit on Oct 06, 2015 12:59pm
Im fairly certain I said adding underground to the mix, not abandoning the pit, fairly certain the test program was paying for itself per CC and Im fairly certain the deferred strip capital expenses are winding down so any additional capital probably easily absorbed if payback is swift.  We shall see how it plays out.
Comment by handyrandy321 on Oct 06, 2015 1:57pm
Underground costs are far higher than open pit, Nevermind the required capex to build a shaft with levels. Right now they are losing money with the open pit  
Comment by MisterB on Oct 06, 2015 12:32pm
QuietObserver, My thoughts exactly.  This was the BOD making a decision on Bruce considering the terrible performance of TMM since the Newstrike acquisition and his inability to control the resulting damage. In this move, Sentry investments (who were also invested in Newstrike) get a CEO that is familiar with TMM's most important asset for their future, can raise the capital to move the ...more  
Comment by gbenga on Oct 06, 2015 12:36pm
AMEN @ MisterB and QB!!  It doesnt hurt to pray and be positive as I am beginning to fear for my heart over this one.
Comment by blade86ca on Oct 06, 2015 5:24pm
well said MisterB , all those posts I keep seeing from bashers with their TMM had "explosive" costs last quarter somehow still cannot understand it was cost of dynamite (AKA explosives) that went up , not their costs "exploding" I think they will need a couple quarters but based on this news they should be able to reduce costs (AKA "cost containment")
Comment by blade86ca on Oct 06, 2015 5:10pm
gbenga when a company writes down assets , it means its lowering its book value (typically that helps with taxes) , its not writing OFF its assets as if the land is garbage. BIG difference Yes TMM is looking around for cash to get Ana paula started , if there was bankruptcy possibility this would be trading in the 0.20 range by now
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities