NR, thanks for opening my eyes! Now I got it - we can NOT call Mr McRae
a Fraudster and reason is very simple. He WAS NOT OFFICIALLY CONVICTED
in the Court of law of committing FRAUD. Me stupid clearly understands now.
Lets just forget that Mr. McRae publicly took action (set up the date for AGM
6 months in advance, directly as a response to Special Meeting requested by Dissidents).
Lets also forget that quite reputable legal professional Mr. Greg Gubitz
PUBLICLY called that public action of Mr. McRae/BoD a SHAM (Fraud).
So, our in-house legal experts, considering the above, can we
call Mr. McRae / BoD as SUSPECTED FRAUDSTERS???