Post by
rusty4998 on May 26, 2013 7:41am
We must demand a dividend....
As shareholders we must demand a dividend as part of the sale of the animal division. I personally want AT LEAST a 50 cent payout per share.
Comment by
rusty4998 on May 26, 2013 8:42am
Sorry, I want the up front dividend. Otherwise it's just the same old sheeeet we've been experiencing for years.
Comment by
Nohandledzep on May 26, 2013 1:55pm
HT... What about dumping McRae and getting an immediate 5 bagger on the basis of that decision alone? Then work on a 20 bagger inside of 18 months, selling the parts off. It beats another decade of failed prognostications and pleas for just a bit more time. I agree with Rusty, it is more than evident that every dime of the AH sale left with Bioniche is a dime burned.
Comment by
HighteawithIntrepid on May 26, 2013 2:29pm
Zep I don't agree but that is what makes a market. Your still welcome to join us SWNE
Comment by
DryBones on May 26, 2013 2:56pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
HighteawithIntrepid on May 26, 2013 3:11pm
Dear CS You appear to be in GW's camp, but since they picked up the Fonds shares on the cheap, but didn't bring a cheque book to pay off our 15% loan boys what good are they. The votes for selling will outway the votes against, when the time comes for a vote. Just think of "short" sales and one of the three stooges and the light might turn on for you. HT
Comment by
HighteawithIntrepid on May 26, 2013 5:41pm
The 15% loan boys: Does this explain where I am coming from: They've got us by the short and curlies. We have no choice but to agree.
Comment by
blartar on May 26, 2013 6:04pm
And WHO was the genius ceo who made that 15 % deal ?
Comment by
DryBones on May 26, 2013 7:01pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
HighteawithIntrepid on May 26, 2013 7:51pm
No need your going to loan them $25M at 5% right.
Comment by
HighteawithIntrepid on May 26, 2013 9:24pm
Zep I am not desperate to avoid a meeting, I have no meeting to avoid, I had a meeting remember, it isn't my problem that GW declined my invite. So we wait, review our emails and pick up a little stock here and there and look for ways to entertain ourselves with DimSum and his high net worth. I believe it is GW's move in this game of chess that plays out before us. Until later HT
Comment by
rusty4998 on May 27, 2013 8:56am
I'm tired of just maintaining the pay and perks of the management and employees of BNC. It's time for shareholders to receive a substantial payout. I want a substantial dividend from any sale of the animal division.
Comment by
DryBones on May 27, 2013 9:50am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
rusty4998 on May 27, 2013 10:06am
Drybones, yes if a dividend is paid then all holders of the shares will reap some of the benefit. Do you want us all not to take a dividend because McCrae will also benefit? Sounds like cutting off your nose to spite your face. Give me a dividend!!!!!!
Comment by
rusty4998 on May 27, 2013 11:29am
Well said Chief9. I fully agree. A question for the board. Did BNC somewhat recently receive a buyout offer which was turned down by management for being insufficient? If true, wouldn't you all have liked to at least known how much that offer was for?
Comment by
DryBones on May 27, 2013 11:49am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
cheapinski on May 27, 2013 12:46pm
totally agree with you Beech but I hope that GW gets a court mandate for a shareholders meeting ASAP....I'm f'n tired of the same old Santa Claus parade. BTW, the "opening up the kimono" was particularly narsty!!! lol cheapie
Comment by
thecat777 on May 27, 2013 3:00pm
As I remember it Graeme knew early in 2012 that recruitment was not going well; that no final recruitment milestone would be coming, and that he needed to negotiate with Endo for the return of Urocidin. With Urocidin's future in limbo, no one but CR was willing to put up money for a shaky company with an unproven cancer product.
Comment by
DryBones on May 27, 2013 4:06pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
terr2 on May 27, 2013 4:34pm
I have complete faith in GW and his lawyers. There are just too many misgivings and questionable decisions to with hold purtinate info from the share holders.
Comment by
thecat777 on May 27, 2013 5:19pm
I think Graeme admitted that they knew early on that the recruitment wasn't going tomgomwell. They obviously had a pretty good idea prior to the loan as they had at least a year to monitor how it was going.
Comment by
Nohandledzep on May 27, 2013 7:20pm
I wonder who else knew Cat...did the investors that dumped 75% of the Aussie float know? You know, the ones who had to sell due to the Australian liquidity crisis.
Comment by
DryBones on May 27, 2013 7:23pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy