Post by
SWNE on Jun 20, 2013 9:32pm
WG
Did they or did they not contravene confidentiality agreements? I think they did. Now they have to prove to me they are viable contributes. However, being sculdulgerours, they have a high steep mountain to climb. They are proving themselves to be DkHds, so far.
Comment by
Nohandledzep on Jun 20, 2013 9:55pm
Swine... I don't care whether they knocked off an orphanage and ran through a bus of nuns to fund the share purchase. The bottom line is that the SP quadruples the day they take over. That should tell you something about what we have endured for the last several years.
Comment by
ragingbull2727 on Jun 21, 2013 8:37am
I'm not sure how the share price magically "quadruples" the day they take over, but it sounds good to me.....going from $0.18 to $0.30 is nothing short of a disaster.
Comment by
Nohandledzep on Jun 21, 2013 10:06am
This is a rather simple equation enraged, or should I say deduction. Unless of course you blame the recurring revenue and impressive pipeline for a valuation multiple of less than 1? People don't want change for the sake of change, they want change to finally realize more than 20% value in their investment.
Comment by
ragingbull2727 on Jun 21, 2013 10:12am
Yeah I guess. I'm still waiting to see what Wayne Gretzky does. Maybe this is the Phoenix Coyotes version of Wayne Gretzky??