TELESTA THERAPEUTICS INC T.TST

Damn Yanks issues

[IWillRetireSoon]

I don't understand you:   You have it very correct that the stock is way undervalued.   But then you rant on the current shareholders for the valuation, yet you understand that NEW shareholders are the ones that will bring in the SP increase.   So take the perspective of a prospective researcher who sees this.....   do I see current shareholders who view their holdings with a positive outlook?  Or do I see a bunch of stupidity along with shareholders bit##ing at each other?    Do you think the Bombardier family publically complains about their family due to low share price?   It does not make sense what you are saying.   Be a little patient and wait for Feb., this has been posted many times.

[DamnYankees]

Iwill & HT, you may not realize this but you are the same poster with2 different handles. I am sure that this is not a revelation to anyone else reading here. The odds of two people being so infinitely stupid with regards to biotech investing are beyond comprehension. I realize that you plural and singular would like to relate TST and it's revenue and cash flow models to those of RBC and

[HighteawithIntrepid]

To whom do you reguard as my alter ego? I don't have one but given your intellectual similarities  to DimSum we understand your inability to look at TST as anything but the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. I own it, I want it to succeed but it isn't PFE or one of 3 other drug companies that I also own shares in that trade for billions, earn income and pay a dividend. Until we

[DamnYankees]

Your friend Dimsum rails like an alien abductee who just escaped. He is a just another lunatic here who detracts from the real dialogue. I received an interesting inbox HT. It suggested that until the shareholder base really expands beyond the geographic  Belleville area, where this person claims the bulk of shares are held by aged rural oriented retailers who are waiting on a miracle cow

[IWillRetireSoon]

Why don't you, Somewey and Raging all go somewhere together and scream your theories at each other... and leave the rest of us to make some money.  (even if you are the same person you can still do it) It does not matter that Telesta is bio... it is a speculative penny stock.   These type of stocks don't behave like companies with earnings.   And I don't treat

[DamnYankees]

You are correct  that spec stocks don't behave like those with earnings. They swing wildly and ramp up immensely upon news such as an expedited FDA submission for Bladder Cancer. Then they continue to move higher as the submission date nears and the word is spread. Telesta traded up briefly and then  tanked after a weird financing and hasn't moved since. This is not treading like

[HighteawithIntrepid]

Once upon a time pre ENDO we traded as you suggested, then we did a deal with ENDO  that ended badly and we have been in the penalty  box ever since. It may surprise you to know that we traded off part of our future revenue stream for cash used to do the drug trials that are now  being used to support our filings to the FDA. We have a lot of baggage not visible to a quick read. You

[IWillRetireSoon]

Nortel is a great study in stupid investments and smart investments.    Both were in play.   Add to that bogus and even fraudulant income statements.....   yet the patents they owned were worth Billions 10 years after the company bankrupted.    Great to learn from the mistakes.  Telsta and Nortel and not at all similar but the investors

[DamnYankees]

IWill, I think you have "Nortel" sprinkled through a third of your posts. What possible relationship is there between these two companies other than you trying to imply a sense of failure and bankruptcy? Is that all you have... Nortel? My grandfather used to invoke the "Remember Pearl Harbour" line whenever a Japanese car drove down his street in the 70s. I can almost make the

[HighteawithIntrepid]

FYI nortel had a large plant in Belleville 

[DamnYankees]

Oh nortel had a plant in Belleville. See I didn't know that. I thought he was mentioning it to arouse thoughts of severe  financial loss and terminal investment risk. So it was just a local example of a public company that didin't  do very well in the end? And a very appropriate analogy. 1,000 s of people made millions on Nortel over the years and then it went bankrupt. Yes a

[IWillRetireSoon]

Dear Mr. Damned I will ignore your absurd accusations - too ridiculous to respond to.    As I have said previously, sharing of experiences and strategies can benefit all.    I only refered to Nortel as; 1) it is well known, 2) I have owned it in the past and profited nicely from it. and 3) it was hoped that it would serve as an example of how investors can profit from any

[princeofcut]

ROTFLMAO...so here is hewillbedeadsoon yapping and pumping and touting about the 2015 share price of TST he predicted, check it out:<< I won't sell then nor at below $1 as I think it can easily go to $3 or $4 in 2015!!!!>>  so deadsoon care to update us all on why you have been so failed in your price prediction to date???? and yes you are a TST bagholder, like you i bought

[txbioinv]

cuuunnntofprince, you just got caught up again in your web of lies; first your trying to decide if your buying in your first initial shares, now your saying you have bought and sold several times. I think if you own us, then who is the quueeerbate? go away basher