Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure Ltd T.TWM

Alternate Symbol(s):  TWMIF | T.TWM.DB.A

Tidewater Midstream and Infrastructure Ltd. is a diversified midstream and infrastructure company with an integrated value chain across North American natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), crude oil, refined product, and renewable energy markets. The Company's operations include downstream facilities, natural gas processing facilities, NGLs infrastructure, pipelines, storage, and various... see more

TSX:TWM - Post Discussion

View:
Post by firstworld on Mar 01, 2021 11:35pm

Pipeline Sale

so what happened? Did it slip under the rug with 100% 45 yr finance to the in-laws of c-suite?
Comment by fauxtomato on Mar 02, 2021 10:48am
From the Canadian Utilities Q4 call last week: Natural gas transmission also entered into an agreement in September to acquire 100 kilometers of the Pioneer Pipeline here in Alberta for a net purchase price of $200 million. The transaction is subject to regulatory approvals by the AUC and the Alberta Energy Regulator, which are expected in the second quarter of 2021.
Comment by rustyblades on Mar 03, 2021 8:31am
Fron TA's Annual report news release this morning "Together with our partner, Tidewater Midstream & Infrastructure Ltd., entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. ("ATCO") to sell the Pioneer Pipeline for a purchase price of $255 million ($127.5 million net to TransAlta). This agreement replaces the Company's previous agreement from ...more  
Comment by fauxtomato on Mar 03, 2021 9:59am
May comment on the timing of the sale on the call today. I should have pointed out that ATCO's $200M figure is only for the portion of the pipe they would own: some would be owned by NGTL, and some assets currently in the JV are being sold to TransAlta. What an insane transaction.
Comment by firstworld on Mar 03, 2021 10:51am
Failed deal comprised of 3+ back to back elements not to mention relatives of c-suite and opaque holding co interest. Such a small deal lime this taking so long is deeply troubled or bogged down in corrupt corpnpolitics everyone scrambling for pennies to buy new play boats for 2021 season. This is a typical Soviet era deal and no surprise as Canada now a welfare state with second highest federal ...more  
Comment by fauxtomato on Mar 03, 2021 12:31pm
This seems strangely personal yet vague and ill informed. I can't tell if you know what you're talking about (with this asset in particular) or you just need to vent about Canada with the same tired lines in several forums. Either say something new or don't say anything, it's not hard. This circular, hyperbolic ranting with vague innuendos to make yourself feel good doesn't ...more  
Comment by fauxtomato on Mar 05, 2021 1:52pm
The new arguments are up, it's an interesting read
Comment by fauxtomato on Mar 06, 2021 3:37pm
Some of these statements crack me up. What a mess, glad it's not my job to make sense of this stuff. Yeesh.
Comment by nkbourbaki on Mar 06, 2021 8:03pm
I was thinking exactly the same thing.  I read the evidence and think "that's a good point". Then I read the rebuttal and think "that's a good point".   I have no idea if this is par for the course or if the aggressive language is specific to this case.  AP really banging the drum that the intervenors are asking the commission to consider issues ...more  
Comment by firstworld on Mar 07, 2021 10:28am
The whole thing is harious and reeks of massive corruption at all levels when HSE can do a huge true "investment grade" deal in 1/4 of the time. Since when do regulators comment or influence divestment price...that only happens in former soviet economies and 3 rd world dictator ships. This think smells sobadlybthay should be delisted pending investigation.
Comment by fauxtomato on Mar 07, 2021 11:01am
Clearly, I was suspicious of this deal when it was announced: why build a 100 mile pipeline in a province already crisscrossed with them? But who should be delisted here: Atco, TransCanada, TransAlta, or Tidewater? Thanks for your insight!
Comment by nkbourbaki on Mar 07, 2021 2:13pm
Probably best to err on the side of caution and delist them all.   
Comment by fauxtomato on Mar 07, 2021 4:52pm
In an earlier presentation when TransAlta unveiling their coal to gas strategy they claimed the coversion would extend the life of the units to the  late 2030s [about 15 years of the max size contract with AP] , at which time they could potentially be covered to combined cycle. https://www.transalta.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-Investor-Day-Presentation-Final-1.pdf At the time the ...more  
Comment by firstworld on Mar 09, 2021 9:35am
Remember that your tax dollars paid for 100% of that transition. They also made huge profits on changeover, a tax dollars. AB should just Nationalize the powergen since the tax layers door the bill. Everyone in Canada needs to stop pretending they are "businessmen" in a centrally planned and funded economy. This is just good old fashioned Soviet replication with the cheesy guys in suits ...more  
Comment by nkbourbaki on Mar 11, 2021 8:54am
I think you might be a psychic.   Thanks for your thoughts, as usual.
Comment by fauxtomato on Mar 11, 2021 9:47am
Haha, thanks! I think my source on that was a conversation we'd had. Similar to Pipestone, they've telegraphed this in various ways but nice to get some framework around timing, cost, and returns. I don't know if I'm emotionally ready for another few years of mounting debt and slow to ramp returns, though. Q1 2021 may be the first time the Pipestone plant really hits full ...more  
Comment by AntoninScalia on Mar 11, 2021 10:00am
What's your take on the renewable diesel and hydrogen complex investment? $75 million in EBITDA for a $125 million investment (net of BC credits) sounds insanely good.
Comment by fauxtomato on Mar 11, 2021 2:40pm
I don't know enough about the market or the project to comment intelligibly but it looks good on paper. I think the BC credits would take the form of marketable BC LCFS credits https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/farming-natural-resources-and-industry/electricity-alternative-energy/transportation/renewable-low-carbon-fuels/monthly_credit_market_report_-_2021-02.pdf which adds an element of ...more  
Comment by AntoninScalia on Mar 11, 2021 6:58pm
Let's hope for a Ballard Power type of re-rate in the shares due to the hydrogen rush. 
Comment by firstworld on Mar 12, 2021 2:08am
Well at least they didn't call this highly speculative prospective welfare opportunity " investment grade" haha. All of these welfare projects are failures within months of construction start. There deals are garbage ....we all saw how ON screwed authentic institutional green power developers who bought into the FIT program with $BNs. Just change the rules poof there goes $20 BN If ...more  
Comment by fauxtomato on Mar 12, 2021 8:02am
The appeal of 'midstream and infrastructure' is that it is essential and necssary, a basic service that should retain value over time and through economic cycles. Not assets that are made economically viable through the exchange of invented credits. What happens when diesel in BC hits $1.50 or $2/l? Do these credits get scrapped on a change in provincial government? I don't believe ...more  
Comment by AntoninScalia on Mar 12, 2021 8:58am
I'm confused by the pessism. When the government wants to give you free money to start a potentially really profitable venture you take it. Many governments will become aggressive in transforming their economies to produce less carbon/pollution. They will dole out lots of money in order to so and we should be cheering them on as shareolders of a company that can create a venture 50% paid by ...more  
Comment by fauxtomato on Mar 12, 2021 9:31am
I'm skeptical of being involved in public-private partnerships in general. I realize part of this may be a personal thing. I think the LCFS program is generally believed to be effective in lowering carbon intensity, and I don't mind TWM participating, or the government initiative to help fund the project. I do think that regulation fueling the profits of private companies can be a bad look ...more  
Comment by firstworld on Mar 09, 2021 9:40am
Well, demand return of all welfare dollars from the first three, or Nationalize them, and delist TWM for highly deceptive practices, corruption, and misuse of investor dollars, and get all the welfare back plus seize all directors assets and other related parties as well pending unexplained wealth investigation outcome everyone else too. Do it like the Russians do with corrupt people swindling the ...more  
Comment by fauxtomato on Mar 09, 2021 5:44pm
I can't disagree with any of the points you come close to making, because before you make them you get derailed into the same cookie cutter rants. Either make a point and educate us all or don't. I will agree that Canada is not Russia...?
Comment by firstworld on Mar 10, 2021 9:52am
Has the pipeline been sold yet? At least they should make an announcement on the previous announcements LOL this is comedy hour of bumbling incompetence. Everyone know they are late paying and on the cusp of bankruptcy currently negotiations extent and pretend on the backs of tax dollars bank bailouts. If there ever was a ponzi scheme Canada is it LOL. That's why all foreign cash has fled to ...more