Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Ursa Major Minerals Incorporated T.UMJ

TSX:UMJ - Post Discussion

View:
Post by tickle1st on Oct 29, 2008 4:36pm

Thrumuck

Having your old mans money to fall back on to help cushion the Pat blow doesn't hurt either.

Some of us have had to earn what we have and don't take lightly the fact that some people chose to gamble it away instead of looking after their own house. I tell you, if URSA owes 2 million in a loan like Kerbrilliant said....and RS was investing in Pat instead of paying it down....we should all be questioning his ability to look after our shareholding.

all I want is a  BofD to ensure he stays in check from this point on. If he can't, i want a change to the person holding the purse strings. I'm expecting that at this point, there must be some accountability for his gamble of URSA money on pat.

We dodged a bullet. But I'm not so sure RS thinks that.

Time will tell. Even though I don't think we have time on our side if the money runs out before we get shipping again.
Comment by Thunderhead1 on Oct 29, 2008 8:28pm
Tickle wrote: "Some of us have had to earn what we have and don't take lightly the fact that some people chose to gamble it away instead of looking after their own house." More hypocrisy out of Tickle. To be closer to the truth, Tickle would have to add the following: ".....unless the gamblers' names happen to be IESO and/or Gary Kirk, in which case all losses will be ...more  
Comment by tickle1st on Oct 29, 2008 10:38pm
DunderheadI get the feeling that you lost money on IESO as well? Why else would it wear on you so much?How's the retirement?funny how the Patsie Kerbrilliant says he's going to vote against the Pat deal. Is he that stupid?? If the Pat deal fails to go thru, URSA will be the next disaster he owns.Man...where is his head at?? Opps, we know where his heads at. I just forgot.