Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Vermilion Energy Inc T.VET

Alternate Symbol(s):  VET

Vermilion Energy Inc. is a Canada-based international energy producer. The Company seeks to create value through the acquisition, exploration, development, and optimization of producing assets in North America, Europe, and Australia. Its business model emphasizes free cash flow generation and returning capital to investors when economically warranted, augmented by value-adding acquisitions. The... see more

TSX:VET - Post Discussion

Vermilion Energy Inc > Tuesday’s analyst upgrades and downgrades Globe & Mail
View:
Post by bossu on Mar 09, 2021 8:27am

Tuesday’s analyst upgrades and downgrades Globe & Mail

Fundamentals are “quickly improving” for Vermilion Energy Inc. (
VET-T -3.83%decrease
 
), said Raymond James analyst Jeremy McCrea following the releasing fourth-quarter 2020 financial results after the bell on Monday that fell in-line with production expectations and exceeded cash flow estimates.

“Our thesis on VET has historically been one of profitability,” he said. “Much of this is due to their international diversification where ‘conventional’ style geology generally has better rates of return than shale/tight oil plays. This high return on capital allowed the company to have a much higher dividend payout, even while holding production and leverage levels steady over the last five years. The rapid decline in commodity prices in 2020 however quickly had Vermilion playing defence given the drop in cash flow. With pricing for both oil and gas now rebounding (including European gas), and the elimination of the dividend, the leverage outlook is quickly improving (i.e., 1.1 times 2022 debt-to-cash flow at strip.

“Although spending and production guidance was unchanged from January (when oil was $55), FCF is now expected at $350-million (at $60 WTI), implying an 11-per-cent FCF [free cash flow] yield. This doesn’t quite explain the full turnaround as declines are moving to 21 per cent (from 25 per cent) and with the increasing balance sheet flexibility, will allow Vermilion to redeploy capital back likely later this year (and reinstate a dividend in 2022). With torque to the share price given the company’s leverage, profitable projects but shareholder sentiment on the name still low, we believe VET could have plenty more upside to the name if commodity prices hold.”

Mr. McCrea maintained an “outperform” rating for Vermilion shares with an $11 target, rising from $8. The average target on the Street is $8.20.

Several equity analysts on the Street raised their target prices for its shares, including:

* Scotia’s Gavin Wylie to $9.25 from $8.50 with a “sector perform” rating.

* BMO Nesbitt Burns’ Ray Kwan to $11 from $7 with a “market perform” rating.

 

* RBC Dominion Securities’ Greg Pardy to $10 from $9 with a “sector perform” rating.

* CIBC World Markets’ David Popowich to $10 from $7 with a “neutral” rating. T

Comment by GregC24 on Mar 09, 2021 9:33am
Latest Research (March 09, 2021): OUR TAKE: Positive. Headline CFPS of $0.85 / $135M (+18% q/q) came in 14% ahead of our expectation of $0.75 / $121M and 22% above consensus of $0.70 / $115M. While production of 87,848 boe/d (-8% q/q) was right in line with consensus of 87,892 boe/d, higher realized prices / sales volumes and lower cash taxes contributed to the CFPS beat. See Exhibit 1 for a ...more  
Comment by downtozero on Mar 09, 2021 9:35am
Target increases are good, but without rating improvements there may be minimal impact on VET for the short term compared to peers. Once debt gets well below the 2B mark, I'm sure some holds will become buys.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities