Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Valeura Energy Inc T.VLE

Alternate Symbol(s):  VLERF

Valeura Energy Inc. is an upstream oil and gas company engaged in the production, development, and exploration of petroleum and natural gas in the Gulf of Thailand and the Thrace Basin of Turkiye. The Company holds an operating working interest in four shallow water offshore licenses in the Gulf of Thailand, which include G10/48 (Wassana field), B5/27 (Jasmine and Ban Yen fields), G1/48 (Manora... see more

TSX:VLE - Post Discussion

Valeura Energy Inc > the key is the income tax payable each year.
View:
Post by drunk@noon on Mar 24, 2024 7:54am

the key is the income tax payable each year.

If one assumes 22,500 bopd and 85 brent and sga 32 mill, 230 milll op ex, 150 mill cap ex 8 mill exxploratii and 14% royalties (they seem to float in the 13.5%) you are taking 180 million us or 240 mill canadian free cashflow BEFORE CASH TAXES. So the question is what do you model for taxes. Assuming they can add another year of 20,000 production to the 4 years life of the field, you can mulitply that amont by 5. and then rest of the proceeds during the years of declining production can be applied to costs of closing down the field as well as pushing out those costs, whle the  Billion dollars CDN have already been redeployed into another project/or projects. Not bad for a 430 mill market cap. It's all about pushing out the reclaimation costs and packing hundreds of million of dollars into the piggy bank over the next 4-5 years.
Comment by bullhorn3 on Mar 24, 2024 12:26pm
Are you firstworld without the spelling/grammar problem? Using your theory, VLE could never reach where they are today, so something is broken in your logic. Also, the 2 large shareholders, who may possibly know more about the situation than guys in Canada, are committing more money as they buy shares... incomprehensible with your logic. Also, the reservoir seems to have a life of its own, giving ...more  
Comment by calvin43951 on Mar 24, 2024 2:00pm
I'm not sure what you mean by my logic is broken In regards to the two extremely large shareholders, you have to remember that one has been there for many years. Our newest shareholder, obviously has knowledge of the operations down there given it is in their own territory. It only makes sense they fully understand what Vle has and the potential that lies within. I agree with you, these ...more  
Comment by bullhorn3 on Mar 25, 2024 11:41am
My comment about broken logic refers to the original post "the key is the income tax payable each year" by drun@noon, not you. My major objection about you is your replies to firstworld. Press "ignore" and your pain goes away.
Comment by firstworld on Mar 25, 2024 4:02pm
LOL not missing out up 900% on my original 200K shares holding since .42 AVG 10 years ago.  I did enjoy many swing trades on another 200-300K shares capturing anywhere between 5% in days to 20-40% in a few weeks. Where are they today? $8M loss on $87 oil. 20% SH dilution on Emergency $20M raise weeks after "no dilution" and deal close. Flat 20K bbl day production ( slightly ...more