VIQ Solutions Inc T.VQS

This constantly self off

[Twodjays]

Watching this slowly beating down is difficult to understand why there has been no bad news or is it because of no news whatever the reason being a investor and not a trader it's difficult to understand.

[pacer217]

Good Morn Silence is never a good thing in investment world.. You are in the minority of being investor / not a trader. Retailers  (which is VQS topic)  are day traders even . hourly traders. If  a couple of weeks go by, they sell and move to the next exciting  trade -- like "AMC"  or "Gamestop" or "AT" -- stocks that swing 8% to 12 % IN a

[pacer217]

AS a follow up to what I just wrote--  The BID - $8.14 to ASK $8.69  ONE person on each!! A gap of .50 cents plus!! This may cause the little seller to panic and drop his  ASK -- and a spiral down ensues! NO one is looking to buy today.

[italiano]

vqs sharecount ticking higher w/uptick in shares 100% consumed free of charge by "insiders", ie, management and board were it not for a poor and greedy capital markets strategy from "mgt/board" vqs would be a $500,000,000 USD company 100% Canadian based board members for a company that does over 80% in USD revenues is really dumb

[Twodjays]

I understand where you're coming from but what's the answer how can we change this do you have the solution I would certainly like to see this turn into a five hundred million company i have been waiting longer than most and would certainly like to reap the benefits  Dan 

[profitprophet1]

I don't follow what you are saying. I've been in since October and am already sitting on a double. If you're a longer term holder you're up more than me. Variations day to day on 100 or 10000 shares aren't indicative of the company's real value. You're wondering how to solve the problem. Two ideas come to mind: don't expect share price to more than double in a year

[italiano]

your comments are a lame excuse for vqs' current valuation and do not reflect my thinking the singular shareholder objective should be "maximum valuation" of vqs.  you may be satisfied w/a glass "half full" but a glass "completely full" is so much more sensational/exciting, ie, $500,000,000+ Capitalization if the technology were so disruptive, why isn't