Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Veren Inc T.VRN

Alternate Symbol(s):  VRN

Veren Inc. is a Canada-based oil producer with assets in central Alberta and southeast and southwest Saskatchewan. The principal activities of the Company are acquiring, developing and holding interests in petroleum and natural gas properties and assets related thereto through a general partnership and wholly owned subsidiaries. Its core operational areas include Kaybob Duvernay and Alberta... see more

TSX:VRN - Post Discussion

Veren Inc > nat gas news....
View:
Post by downwithdotcom1 on May 23, 2024 10:47am

nat gas news....

this is what is important to VRN investors see below..dwdc

"Natural Gas price has added another piece to its staggering performance for this year. Since the low of February 24th at $1.6290, gas prices have rallied near 90% to $3.08 on Wednesday. The recent surge comes after Russia communicated that it will redraw borders in the Baltic Sea for its exclave Kaliningrad and around a few Russian Islands near St. Petersburg, heightening tensions for all Baltic and Scandinavian countries in the region with risk that Russia could cut off and control the entrance to the Baltic Sea. "
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 23, 2024 11:02am
Oh and to only think we could of built a dozen LNG plants in the last few years like the US has but our government said there was no business case for it. 100M bucks a load all heading for Germany, Japan, Greece, Indonesia, but no. No business case for it. Sad really.
Comment by packerdriver on May 23, 2024 11:47pm
HOGWASH !!! The US was able to export LNG quickly because the plants, pipelines and port facillities were ALREADY BUILT !!! The US IMPORTED LNG for decades from the middle east. The Marcellus happened, cheap gas was everywhere on the east coast, prices plummeted. Those plants were redundant and economical and were mothballed. When the war in Europe erupted and prices there skyrocketed it was a ...more  
Comment by DivChase on May 24, 2024 12:30am
Your mostly right on the mark except two things IMO.  1) Just because it takes 20 years to build anything here, doesn't mean that's true in the USA.  Likely a project the scale of LNG Canada can get done in 5 to 8 years in Texas.  2) your comment about "no one would take this risk" is not true.  Leaders of Germany and Japan where prepared to sign long term ...more  
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 24, 2024 9:21am
Many of our oil and gas producers fled south to the welcoming arms of President Trump, Kinder Morgan being one of the majors, over the years this imbecile in Ottawa has been chasing investment out of the country. Investment and productivity are at historic lows and our debt and deficits are at never-before-seen obcene levels(1 billion/week interest payments) under the Son of Castro's reign ...more  
Comment by Moemoney42 on May 24, 2024 11:38am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by packerdriver on May 24, 2024 11:58am
Kinder Morgan is a major oil and gas producer??? Say what? KM never produced a barrel of oil in its life! It's a pipeline company that happenned to own the ONLY oil pipeline that crosses the rocky mountains is all of North America. Ya think if such a pipeline across the mountains made economic and logistic sense the Americans would have built even a SINGLE one decades ago??? Anyway, KM balked ...more  
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 24, 2024 12:54pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by Moemoney42 on May 24, 2024 1:32pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by DivChase on May 24, 2024 4:46pm
He's right and he is wrong.   He is absolutely correct that both generations of Trudeau's have been complete disasters for Alberta.  I'm just guessing but if not for the constant interference in our industry here over 50 years we would probably be producing double what we are now   It's also undeniable this government has by way of stifling business here prompted ...more  
Comment by packerdriver on May 24, 2024 9:47pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 25, 2024 9:34am
If Trudeau had built more pipelines we would of been getting world prices for our oil other than being tied to one buyer, the US, for all these years, andTrudy would rather bring in 350,000 barrels a day of Saudi oil at world prices than use our own. This illustrates the lack of brains of this idiot and by the way, his step dad Pierre gave the west the finger in1982 at Salmon Arm. But they sure ...more  
Comment by packerdriver on May 25, 2024 11:24am
OMG ! You want Trudeau to build you another pipeline??? That ain't going to happen! How many pipelines did Harper build in his 9 years??? Heck, how many pipelines were built by anybody under Harper's watch??? ZERO! Multinational oil companies (and a national like Irving) buy crude oil from wherever for their refineries given quality/grade, availability and price considerations. (Trudeau ...more  
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 25, 2024 12:31pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 25, 2024 12:57pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 25, 2024 2:40pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by packerdriver on May 25, 2024 3:17pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 25, 2024 4:04pm
The first thing Trudeau did was cancel the Northern Gateway pipe and cancel tankers on our north coast. The Trans Mtn pipe was in the works long before he came along and panicked when Kinder told him to take the TM pipe and stuff it because of all the beauracracy and protests and red tape that Cathrine McKenna was throwing up in the way at the time.. Thus him spending 4.5B of my money and an ...more  
Comment by packerdriver on May 25, 2024 4:53pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 25, 2024 5:47pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 25, 2024 5:55pm
Not to mention the perma-frost issues the Trans Alaska Pipe also has to deal with. Yes, perma-frost, the stuff you eco freaks want us to think is all melted because of your global warming nonsense.
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 25, 2024 7:03pm
The tankers that Trudy banned on the north coast would of been using Gardner Canal in and out of Kitimat, the exact route LNG tankers will now be using to transport gas with the equivalent of several atom bombs if ignited. 2 days shorter shipping route to Asia and of course Trudy and his eco mob used every excuse under the sun that the route was unsafe. Ships captains have said they would rather ...more  
Comment by packerdriver on May 25, 2024 8:44pm
You're funny....the TEZ was/is from Prince William Sound in the north....to Juan de Fuca Strait in the south. Tankers are/were allowed in both places....anywhere in between they have/had to stay 100 NM offshore... Nothing's changed since 1985. So yeah, you did see tankers in Juan de Fuca....so did everybody else....you're not "special". What's your point?
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 26, 2024 9:49am
The TEZ could easily be excluded by a willing government to allow tankers in and out of ports anywhere on our coast. Why will LNG ships with extremely hazardous cargo be using the same routes on our coast that tankers would of?? These were all arguments in the press and the public at the time of Trudy banning everything and yes, shipping people said they would rather stay the hell out of Vancouver ...more  
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 26, 2024 11:34am
Who said anything about being 'special' because I pointed out that big tankers come in so close to our shores that you could almost hit them with a rock. Your the one that tries to get people to believe that just because they're an oil tanker they have disaster written all over them and are far too big of risk to be anywhere near our coast. They've been doing it since the 70s with ...more  
Comment by packerdriver on May 26, 2024 1:28pm
Yep, the Exxon Valdez cost 2.8 BILLION to clean up and another 1 BILLION to settle all the damage claims. The Queen of the North went down in the very channel that tankers would have used if NG had been allowed to happen. Nobody cares who the skippers of both vessels were or what they were doing at the time of the disasters. The point is they happened. GET IT? All of that is why the US agrees with ...more  
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 26, 2024 2:53pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 26, 2024 2:57pm
Lets ban all aircraft because sometimes they crash. Get real.
Comment by packerdriver on May 26, 2024 3:32pm
when a plane goes down it doesn't contaminate 1300 miles of coastline like the Valdez spill did. A plane crash takes a few days to clean up....not THREE YEARS that it took to clean up after the Valdez. Thirty years later area residents are still living with some consequences of the spill that clean up was never able to fully address. https://response.restoration.noaa.gov/oil-and-chemical ...more  
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 26, 2024 3:43pm
Please explain why people pick and grow fresh shellfish and consume it without consequences on the beaches of the English Channel, where during WW2 the beaches were awash with Bunker C  from thousands of sunken vessels. It was said the beaches were covered with oil and blood for as far as you could see for hundreds of miles in every direction and was never cleaned up, but if we have one ...more  
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 26, 2024 4:38pm
When a plane goes down sometimes hundreds of people lose their lives. There were no lives lost on the Exxon Valdez and everywhere I look where I go these days we have seals, sea lions, sea otters, eagles, sea gulls, killer whales, grey whales, herons, in some cases far too many seals and sea lions eating too many fish. I dont see any consequences of ship wrecks anywhere. Crab, prawns, halibut ...more  
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 26, 2024 3:16pm
Well someone can feel put upon about how I explained the circumstances of the Queen of the North hitting the rocks and sinking, but it was indeed because the Captain and the First Mate were having sexual relations at the time of the incident. This is how prosecutors and lawyers related the incident to the general public so I dont know why this would be considered vulgarity and profanity, but this ...more  
Comment by packerdriver on May 26, 2024 3:50pm
The best part of all of that was the "IMO" at the end. Good for you! NOBODY CARES what the captains were doing when they ran aground....THEY RAN AGROUND... in an extremely sparsely populated area making early and effective spill response impossible.
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 26, 2024 3:59pm
You must not have a clue about the history of our coast. We have many dozens of ship wrecks and vessel sinkings of note going back a couple hundred years and thats just the way it is. I'm not obcessed with it because it really has no consequence or harm in the overall history of the place.
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 25, 2024 4:13pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by westcoastlogger on May 25, 2024 10:27am
You make it sound like they only hate Trudy and teach hatred for him in Alberta. Come on!! We hate him everywhere across the entire country.
Comment by Marty47 on May 25, 2024 12:32pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by Marty47 on May 25, 2024 1:33pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities