Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Veresen Inc. T.VSN.DB.B

TSX:VSN.DB.B - Post Discussion

Veresen Inc. > Jordan Cove may never get built
View:
Post by righand2 on Dec 08, 2015 9:28am

Jordan Cove may never get built

The Financial Post reports in its Tuesday edition that Veresen has again pushed back a sanctioning decision for a liquefied natural gas project on the coast of Oregon. The Post's Geoffrey Morgan writes that if built, the $6-billion (U.S.) Jordan Cove LNG project would be the most ambitious and most expensive project Veresen has undertaken. The Calgary company is expected to spend $98-million (U.S.) on Jordan Cove LNG in 2016, and a final investment decision is now expected in the second half of 2016. Veresen had previously hoped to reach a decision on Jordan Cove in the middle of 2016, after pushing the decision back from late 2015 as a result of delays with permits from the U.S. government. The company now expects to receive approvals for Veresen's LNG project and connecting pipeline by the end of December. AltaCorp analyst Dirk Lever said Veresen will need "a partner or partners" to help finance the project. "My suspicion is that part and parcel of signing up the long-term off-take agreement is also somebody coming in and saying, 'We'll take a piece of the project,' because if they're very high credit quality, that would make a huge difference," Mr. Lever said. "This is a company that can't do it on its own."
Comment by rdwww on Dec 09, 2015 11:43am
there is nothing new there, other than the negative slant. The process was delayed by the US govt., Got it and then on to next phase. So we are waiting for approvals that were delayed pending the US govt approval. THese are expected end of Dec it suggets. So the time line moved another 6  months into 2016, about the same as the delay. Not odd. And given the enviro, draggin it out a bit gets ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities