Post by
Sooner on Feb 21, 2021 7:45am
Barrick and others
At one point someone on this board stated they use $1200 and something like $2.5 for gold and copper prices in their NPV calcs. At what point do those get updated....they might not have much MA activities if they don't update that....
Comment by
Pinegrove1 on Feb 21, 2021 7:57am
The industry should use a common gold, copper price as well as discount rate or we end up comparing apples to oranges.
Comment by
Pinegrove1 on Feb 21, 2021 7:59am
My vote is $1,500, $3.50 and 5%
Comment by
Moneymann on Feb 21, 2021 8:10am
I second that , underline 5% discount
Comment by
Sooner on Feb 21, 2021 10:54am
Base metals use 8% discount and gold uses 5%...i think that is just historical norms for some unknown reason. Our Corp presentation used to show both at some point. This can literally makes > $1B usd difference in the 2013 FS even...
Comment by
jclarke042 on Feb 21, 2021 11:07am
Looking at Gold's short term trajectory, I'm fine if Barrick (or whoever else) keeps low prices when evaluating, it'll make 15-1700 gold look good by comparison. One of Casino's selling points is strong economics wherever we happen to be in the price cycle.
Comment by
blueboron99 on Feb 21, 2021 11:28am
JC, yes we sure do have all the bases covered! (bb-99)
Comment by
Heywood_Silvers on Feb 21, 2021 12:24pm
$1,500 gold (USD I am assuming......I hope!!) for the PEA figures? Are you trying to short this stock? That is a ridiculosly low price. $1,700 has to be the BARE MINIMUM gold price if I or anyone else wants to take the new PEA seriously.
Comment by
jclarke042 on Feb 21, 2021 12:34pm
LOL. Yes heywood, I'm trying to short WRN. If you reread what I wrote: if Barrick uses 1200 gold, MOST projects become uneconomical, but we are still a good deal even then. If Barric starts using 1500 or higher, it might get ideas about other projects NOT named Casino.