Post by
GardenManman on Feb 20, 2023 8:56pm
Paul is innocent.
He was not intent to hurt the SP. He had to do this because options is going to be expried soon. What a poor CEO to do this hard move. And next following 5 years. He has to make same move next 5 years because he still have almost 1million options to excercise(if we ausume: he will not be foced to get more new options in next 5 fice year.). Why company assign too much options to Paul, he can't afford it based on his salary. So should we increase his salary to help him? It is a difficult decision for him. What a poor guy.
Comment by
GardenManman on Feb 20, 2023 9:00pm
And many long term shareholders are feel so sorry to force CEO to face this difficult situation. How about you guys donate some for him to settle his yearly huge options?
Comment by
Sooner on Feb 21, 2023 6:14am
Oh geez...now we got the liberals whining about how much others make and complain about how they spend their income if they don't spent it the way THEY think is best! Probably 95% of the world looks at your annual compensation and views you the same way you view Paul compensation and would criticize your employer the same way you criticize Paul and his employer!
Comment by
gratvalyou on Feb 21, 2023 7:55am
Paul?..... is that you? defending your lack of leadership skills & constantly prepping us for a low buyout?