Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Western Copper and Gold Corp T.WRN

Alternate Symbol(s):  WRN

Western Copper and Gold Corporation is a Canada-based mining company. The Company is engaged in developing the Casino Project. The Casino Project is a copper-gold mining project in Yukon, Canada. The Casino porphyry copper-gold-molybdenum deposit is located in west central Yukon, in the northwest trending Dawson Range mountains, approximately 300 kilometers (km) northwest of the territorial... see more

TSX:WRN - Post Discussion

Western Copper and Gold Corp > Will Rio act before Nov 28 ?
View:
Post by Marine2 on Aug 31, 2023 2:15pm

Will Rio act before Nov 28 ?

What are the chances of this happing ?



By exercising of the extension rights, Rio Tinto continues to have the right to appoint:

  • one director of the Company, if Rio Tinto’s ownership increases to at least 12.5% before November 28, 2023.
(Buy more shares in the market) I think it's slim to none right now ! Only 3 Mo to go to Nov 28 .

M2
Comment by GardenManman on Aug 31, 2023 3:01pm
Act what? If there is no bidding war happen, Why Rio hurry to dive into Yukon, buy more dilution shares to 12.5%, and let the local company (WRN) to finish the permitting,  it will be best solution to Rio, if no competition, no hurry to takeover, so no big move in November: just some million(small amount can be ignored by Rio) for new shares to 12.5% and get a seat, that's their plan ...more  
Comment by GardenManman on Aug 31, 2023 3:04pm
If happen just like as said, SP to keep this cheap level for 3 years, it is a stupid dead money and stupid game, winner is Rio, they pay bill , so they control the game.
Comment by GardenManman on Aug 31, 2023 3:29pm
I don't blame Paul. He knows that his main task is finding another major to compete  with Rio, then push Rio to make a real step. That's  why he had events schedule to promote outside instead of communicate  with you guys who can't give him a new bidder, retail shareholder just bring noise to him, no help, so they has no motivation to  communicate with you guys
Comment by jclarke042 on Aug 31, 2023 5:06pm
And once Rio has that 12.5% and board seat, all bets are off. As Tucker said today "graph it out" and this all ends with us ultimately taking a low ball bid from Rio.  Do the right thing, Paul and sell now, while we can, not when forced to. I've said before Rio guy must've died inside when Paul said best price you'll get is buying now. It's the exact opposite.  ...more  
Comment by GardenManman on Aug 31, 2023 5:43pm
It is major game, Rio has enough patience if there is no competitor coming. Once term matured in November,  Rio seems no restrictions and  is easy to get 5% from dilution  or from open market, combined with Mitsubishi (Rio's potential parter), Rio control almost 20% share and one seat from Bod, then they just cross the finger and wait the permitting and other infrastructure ...more  
Comment by Heywood_Silvers on Aug 31, 2023 6:17pm
RIO would need in excess of 20% before they realistically exert serious sway in terms of any buyouts being considered.  Until that point, they are more or less "glorified retail" shareholders. If RIO wants to take the 12%, so be it.  But that needs to be the end of the gravy train.  Paul can't prevent any entity who is willing to spend the cash from acquiring 20% or ...more  
Comment by MetalMinded on Aug 31, 2023 6:40pm
Their board member would have to abstain from voting on their own buyout offer or any competing buyout offer to avoid self dealing.  
Comment by jclarke042 on Aug 31, 2023 7:28pm
Metal, that's the least of our problem
Comment by jclarke042 on Aug 31, 2023 7:28pm
At construction time, if choice winds up being: $4 billion loan at 10%, or $800m buyout, which one do you THINK we should take? It's not a question of retail being impatient, it's us having zero leverage when push comes to shove. We have to sell.
Comment by jclarke042 on Aug 31, 2023 8:00pm
Note, my numbers are purely illustrative. The BO offer will be lower, the interest rate higher.
Comment by Heywood_Silvers on Aug 31, 2023 9:47pm
Oh, I welcome much higher interest rates!!  Look back to the 70s when they peaked around 18%.  Gold did a moonshot, increasing almost 2,400% in that timeframe. When I took out my auto loan years ago at 7% I thought to myself I was getting a decent rate.  The crybabies of today whine and moan that the rates may go over 6%. And don't get me started on mortgages.  Wanna know ...more  
Comment by Heywood_Silvers on Aug 31, 2023 9:39pm
Of coure, the goal has always been to enhance the property and to sell to the highest bidder.  Juniors often times will hint at "going it alone".  However, that can be risky unless you are fortunate enough to assemble a stellar class of miners and management who have been there and done that before. We juniors/junior investors aren't miners.  We are investors looking ...more  
Comment by IvanRo on Sep 01, 2023 6:05am
At a high level, Financial Institutions would never lend the full 4bn - it would more than likely be a 70:30 or 60:40 split on debt to equity - based on 60:40 split WRN would need to need a debt facility of 2.4bn  and 1.6bn equity (~8 times current market cap or the mother of all dilutions). On a realistic level.... during construction the interest payments would be rolled up into the ...more  
Comment by Heywood_Silvers on Sep 01, 2023 4:30pm
Nobody is going to loan WRN funds on a "go-it-alone" basis.  No need to even enterain such a thought. True, a bird in hand is worth two in the bush.  That being said, I don't think a bird in hand is necessarily worth three or four in the bush.  I"m in the camp whereby I can wait for the larger rewards once gold revalues. If you don't think gold will revalue ...more  
Comment by IvanRo on Sep 01, 2023 5:41pm
New monetary system backed by gold - it will not happen. Fast forward to about 2:50 into the below video for a simple explainer as to why... Peter Zeihan - Gold As to why Gold Majors want more exposure to copper and Copper Majors want more exposure to gold - its pretty simple they are effectively a natural hedges to each other. In simple terms, poor economic outlook copper down gold up and vice ...more  
Comment by Heywood_Silvers on Sep 03, 2023 1:21am
Interesting you think a monetary system backed by gold won't happen, considering that over the last 2,000 years of monetary history 95% of that time humanity was under something akin to a gold standard. Are we in the current era somehow so much wiser and elightened than our forerunners?  How is it that during the time of the Founding Fathers we had effectively zero inflation?  How ...more