Post by
jclarke042 on Aug 13, 2024 7:48am
YESAB website
I encourage all to visit YESAB's Casino page, and read the letter from Casino detailing reasons for prolonging submission. I won't put into print here the real problem here, but it's continuously glossed over or outright misrepresented by management.
Comment by
MetalMinded on Aug 13, 2024 8:41am
Two main contributors. First, Sandeep delayed any activity on that until he had a handle on what was being permitted. That was by his own admission in the interview. Second, the YESAB moved the goal posts (twice in this most recent process) on what the ESE submission requirements are.
Comment by
CopperAndGold14 on Aug 13, 2024 1:57pm
Excellent suggestion. My reading of the 11-Aug-2024 letter from Casino to YESAB indicates much of the delay came from the panel receiving substantial comments from First Nations that caused the Panel to make revisions to the draft January 2023 Guidelines, that were much greater in scope than the minor clarifications the Panel had said would made in the Final Guidelines.
Comment by
MetalMinded on Aug 13, 2024 3:40pm
While true, this is the YESAB moving the goal posts. A second comment period was unprecedented and not required by YESAB guidelines at the time. Of course none of this would have happened if we had just moved forward with the original submission plan to the requirements of the time about 4 or 5 years ago rather than pausing it at Paul's request.