Xtract One Technologies Inc. T.XTRA

The NCS⁴ Conducts Operational Exercises of Patron Screening

[Skidaddle]

In an effort to improve patron experience, many venues have begun exploring weapons detection systems in hopes of reducing wait times without sacrificing safety or security. To assist the sports and entertainment industry in better understanding these solutions and the operational considerations with their deployment, the NCS has been conducting operational exercises of these technologies.

In October, the NCS assessed Patriot One Technologies’ PATSCAN and Evolv Technology’s Evolv Express. Each solution was deployed in an operational environment and subjected to rigorous performance tests based on advertised capabilities, industry best practices, and existing standards. Exercise outcomes will be available on the NCS website in late November. These reports will provide product information, exercise methodologies, exercise outcomes, and evaluator feedback to assist practitioners in developing a more complete understanding of product capabilities and application.

https://spark.adobe.com/page/sKpDGHrv3VASO/?utm_source=Main+Mailing+List&utm_campaign=247536684b-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_01_18_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_4eada278ac-247536684b-332358076
 
On October 19, the NCS conducted an Operational Exercise of Patriot One Technologies’ PATSCAN on opening night of the Climate Pledge Arena.
 
The NCS conducted an Operational Exercise of Evolv Technology’s Evolv Express® on October 27 at Lower.com Field during a match between the Columbus Crew and Orlando City Soccer Club.

The National Center for Spectator Sports Safety and Security (NCS) conducts operational exercises for products. An operational exercise provides a basic competency test for existing products and processes. As part of the operational exercise, the NCS assembles a team with the requisite expertise, identifies appropriate sites for the exercise, generates relevant scenarios, and simulates end-user interaction to provide constructive feedback for developers and interested parties. By design, the demonstration and exercise allows experts to observe stated capabilities in an operational or simulated environment.
The NCS is an impartial body and does not endorse any products or services. Participation in the Operational Exercise program does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement from the NCS.

[BaronBuffett]

"The NCS is an impartial body and does not endorse any products or services. Participation in the Operational Exercise program does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement from the NCS." For the saboteurs before they spew their fud.

[Nightstocker]

The mother of all bake offs. This is an opportunity to have a neutral third party with significant credentials crown the top dawg. PE bought his 75 K shares several days after NCS4's Pat MSG trial, so he must be feeling pretty confident. Sitting on pins and needles right now...

[TedOrlow]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[TedOrlow]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[JVJ24601]

Lol.  Like NCS4, a collegiate based organization, is going to quietly send a note to Evan and say your system beat Evolv's. It's a 3rd party evaluator, who has both Evolv and Patriot One as Platinum Sponsors for the NCS4 November 9-10 event in Phoenix...   And people say I'm crazy with my Oak View investment/acquisition ideas.  Wait until you see my response to Bocain

[pliskenNYC]

This JV guy is a riot, he comes out of nowhere with a whole story and narrative... gtfoh lmao 

[TheGesharoo]

i rarely come to the stockhouse logged in anymore so I scan through (topically) all the posts and see the paid trolls doing their work.  I dont indulge them w a "view" or reply, because I don't want them to get paid kore because of me. the only multi-million dollar question i have is:  "WHO is paying them??". that answer reveals a LOT about the deliberate

[JVJ24601]

@PliskinNYC.   Still "can't escape" from reading my messages. Lol.   I keep asking you to ignore me, but you can't.  Please, it's simple.  Ignore me.   I have 40+ other readers.  

[TedOrlow]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[JVJ24601]

Same would go for Evolv ceo overseeing PAT... so I highly doubt either wanted that....  they were more than likely there for their own, and not present for the other.  Plus,  and if I was NCS4, and wanted to be completely unbiased and not want the risk of the results shared before my team was ready with the report, I would not agree to have competitors watching as I tested and

[TedOrlow]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[JVJ24601]

@TedOrlow.  Why haven't you blocked me, ignore me please, if I hurt your feeling by challenging your idea that Evans participated in Evolv's test, saw the outcome and purchase only $27k in stock (5% of his salary & bonus).  Is that even rational? If he did and PAT's crushed Evolv, he'd more likely  mortgage his house to invest in PAT and against the current

[TedOrlow]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[JVJ24601]

Thanks for all the love you send @TedOrlow.   Can't wait for you to join mom and me for a bowl of cereal.   With All My Love, JVJ

[john378]

Ted, he bought on the 26th, the test was on the 27th and the shares were recorded on the 28th so buying those shares had nothing to do with the outcome of a test that had not yet happened.