Xtract One Technologies Inc. T.XTRA

PE Gave Us a Big Hint on Twitter

[Nightstocker]

PE liked an NCS4 post involving a joint submission from NCS4 and DHS.

It is an annex listing best practices for public venues and events.

Have a read and tell me who technology DHS and NCS4 are recommending.

I'll give you a hint. It's not Evolv.

https://www.linkedin.cn/feed/update/activity:6868931685698875392

[Nightstocker]

I'm confident this annex also shows which "US Federal Agency" Pat was working with... DHS is a big fish. All IMO

[Roadrunner71]

PE gives us a big hint on Twitter? Is that the same guy that gave us a big hint about the UBS arena a week ago? No credibility with me.

[TedOrlow]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[Nightstocker]

That's your prerogative. I think if you took the time to read the DHS document you'd think otherwise.

[Roadrunner71]

@Nightstocker wrote, "read the DHS document you'd think otherwise" The document is just fine, it's Peter Evans credibility that is in question.

[Nightstocker]

Pretty big leap, isn't it? Evans posts a pic of an MSG terminal, says he is looking forward to a hockey game, and he is suddenly persona non grata? Seriously. Maybe if you hadn't have gone into speculative overdrive based on a post with a picture, you wouldn't have had such a nervous breakdown. SMH.

[Roadrunner71]

@Nightstocker, I guess you forgot about your bet a week ago. You wrote this: "PE is Being Coy Again… My bet is UBS Arena in NY So how much did you loose?  

[Nightstocker]

I didn't lose anything, cause it was speculative. You know, "wouldn't it be cool if..." kind of thing. I also didn't start crying like a seven year old girl and say that Evans was the Antichrist.

[Roadrunner71]

Backpeddling much today, Nightstocker.  That's very impressive, a strawman argument and one ad hominem thrown in for good measure. So you know, an ad hominem is "instead of addressing someone's argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument".

[Nightstocker]

Sounds like it might be best for you to cash out, Roadrunner. You've obviously lost faith in what Pat is doing. Don't go away mad...just go away.

[Nightstocker]

Sorry, but "I saw a post about hockey on a website and I'm so mad cause it totally means the CEO of a company can't be trusted" is not a coherent argument or a position. Unless you are a whiny, seven year old girl. :)

[Roadrunner71]

@Nightstocker wrote "Sorry, but "I saw a post about hockey on a website and I'm so mad cause it totally means the CEO of a company can't be trusted" Dude, the guy posted a photo of two MSG towers at the UBS arena, next to the competitor who actually won the contract and you trust him? Good ya then, you're beyond help. Anyway I'm finished here with this topic. You and

[JVJ24601]

LOL.  Think there is a quick sale of PATs solution to DHS?   Think again...   Without DHS Safety Act, which I believe PE has referenced is being worked on, no DHS sale.  And once that is finished, then add 6 months to a year for a real deployment.   So what does PAT need to survive this long runway... an investment / infusion of money / acquisition.   Why nothing