Xtract One Technologies Inc. T.XTRA

JP’s Take on NCS4 Evaluation

[Nightstocker]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=U0H7oKvVSAI

He makes some very important points here...

For example, Pat scored 100% on several detection tests, but since the evaluators made negative comments about certain aspects of said detection, they were given marks below 3.0. 

Also, only two knives were used in the 1.4 evaluation, as opposed to several in 1.1. If there was a certain knife that didn't detect well, and it forms half of the total results, instead of say, 5 or 10%, then it is going to skew the results in a very negative manner. Wouldn't be surprised if the knife had an aluminum or ceramic core to make it lighter.

These inconsistencies would easily bump Pat from 2.5 to 2.8 or 2.9.

All IMO

[JohnMc84]

Nightstocker.....your comments are spot on correct.    One clarification....the comments do not have to be negative...even if someone provides a neutral comment, that drops the rating.   Any comments, positive, negative, or neutral drops the rating.   For example....someone commented that "Cell phones caused most of the false positives"....that comment

[Nightstocker]

Yeah, I just don't get that...I suppose Xonarsafe must be glad the three evaluators tapped to review their tech weren't very talkative.

[pliskenNYC]

Man I told you there was funny business going on with this report.. Pat should  have gotten At least a 2.8.. other companies getting softball grading.. delayed reports ect.  smells like politics to me..