Trelawney Mining and Exploration Inc TWNNF

ANY JUNIOR OR SENIOR

[THEBIGM27]

would love to have trr problem,these are some of the greatest intercepts ever seen,with great gold values,whenever you get consistant hits of 200 300 400 500 meters,the only thing i can say is,WHICH WAY TO PLUTO,damm what the heck do you want,the tonnage is huge folks,and so will the gold be huge,the next couple of years is going to be intresting,im sticking with my 10 plus million ounce deposit over the next couple of years,lets hope gold will still be on an upswing by then.jmho

[beachman]

Yes the intersections look impressive but as is stands right now most of those intersections are 300m to 400m below surface.  How many tonnes of waste would have to be removed before you can start mining?  What would the stripping ratio be?Furthermore we still don't know the geometry or true width of those intersections and they may be grossly overstated.   More drilling on

[buckhorn]

As I have said before .....you are getting way ahead of yourselves.   They are a long way from proving that there is anything economical there yet.   180m depth makes it less likely to be open pittable as they mayl not be able to remove that much overburden economically.   They have yet to prove continuity of mineralization.   A 43-101 will be a start but don't expect

[gamblor77]

If you watch the video on the Trelawney home page you will see that Chester 1 and Cote lake were estimated to have 2.5+ million ounces.....and that was several months ago. Who knows how many ounces they have added since hitting a half dozen more holes over 200m of 1-2g/t. They have stated this is bulk tonnage, open pittable resource.Don't forget this was a functioning mine in the 80s and it