Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Trelawney Mining and Exploration Inc TWNNF

GREY:TWNNF - Post Discussion

Trelawney Mining and Exploration Inc > Comments on drill results
View:
Post by beachman on Feb 08, 2011 2:03pm

Comments on drill results

The results from section 90 are better than expected.  Mineralization appears to maintain thickess from 100's of meters depth to at least 80 m below surface, and the average grade on this section has improved remarkably relative to the hole that was reported on earlier.  On all other sections reported on the grades and thickness are being maintained down and up dip.   No bottom has been found.

What is and will continue to add fuel to this fire IMHO is precedent that I think was set by the recent Newmont takeover of Fronteer Mining.  Although Fronteer's projects in Nevada don't really compare with Cote Lake, it is the price per ounce of gold that Newmont paid should excite the market in the months to come.  Fronteer had 4.2 million oz on their books and Newmont paid $2.3 billion.   Do the math on that and you get a price greater than $500 per oz.   So what per oz value does one put TRR's resouce at ?  I believe even after cutting Cote Lake to 0.5 g/t we are still looking at 5 million oz and perhaps more. 

The bad news is for GLD wannabees as Cote Lake mineralization has now been proven to be dipping too steeply to ever makie in onto their property.

Yes, I bought back into TRR like I said I probably would.  I will avoid GLD like the plague.

Comment by godisgr81 on Feb 08, 2011 3:39pm
Hey beachman, nice to see on our side. I'm ready for a takeover from the major and would love to double up under the shareholder's rights plan.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities