Post by
bullcat24 on Mar 13, 2011 12:52pm
Offshoreski ... the negative nancy
soooo beside the fact that this guy is bringing up points to discuss about .. i went through the last 7 pages of his post history and he hasn't had a single positive thing to say about any stock... all his painstaking effort has been directed to bashing down stocks. which i do find a little weird since you'd think if he did all this research and is so knowledgable about the process of turning into a producer that he may just at some point along the line found something he liked. but no...
if you ask me this guy has probably found something wrong with every blowjob he's ever gotten.
trr is also already producing and is shipping bulk tonnage to cobalt ontario until they get their own mill up. they plan on ramping up production every year for at least the next 3.
the money will be there is the gold is.... and by offshore saying that this inferred report of 4.2 can translate to not one single ounce of viable gold... really ....really? it it was impossible for one single ounce to be taken out of the ground then this project would of been dead long ago
offshoreski is either a really good devils advocate or gets pure pleasure by over analyzing things with only taking the worst case possibility in mind
Comment by
offshoreskeis on Mar 13, 2011 3:08pm
With names like those you must be watching too much Cramer.You watch now, mining operations as they currently stand won't keep trr going into next year. Their mineable resource is near depletion.