Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Trelawney Mining and Exploration Inc TWNNF

GREY:TWNNF - Post Discussion

Trelawney Mining and Exploration Inc > A truer value of Augen’s lands
View:
Post by wallyz on Jul 15, 2011 11:52am

A truer value of Augen’s lands

I am shareholder of all three companies and will postthis on the boards for TRR, GLD and STA.Upon a review of all the public information available and in my opinionthe following are my thoughts. 

 

It is now apparent (with TRR bid for GLD) that AugenGold value has increased  as theyown all the land around TRR and especially adjacent to the Cote Lake find. 

 

TRR needs the lands to the north, to the south and tothe west of Cote Lake strike to develop an open pit and to extract all gold andto be of real economic value.  The“Pit Envelope” (lands owned by GLD) is needed by TRR but reading all publicinformation the chance for the Cote Lake extension could extend well into theGLD lands.  So it is possible thatAugen could possibly control half (or less) the ounces that TRR has discovereddue to the “PIT ENVELOPE”.

 

It seems that to enable open pit mining of the TRR’s CoteLake find, the pit design has to encompass all the Augen ground in the CoteLake area, otherwise many, many ounces will be mined.

 

That means that Augen controls (directly orindirectly) a large part of the minable ounces.

 

That means that Augen’s share price should be muchhigher, in my opinon $2.00 to $3.00 range.

 

Another very important development was the JointVenture that Augen did with Sanatana Resources (STA) this year. This agreementallows Sanatana to earn up to 51% on the Augen ground surrounding TRR in theCote Lake discovery, (the same ground that TRR needs to mine their 4.2 millionounces to date).  So, Augen andSanatana are sitting pretty and hence shareholders have a great upside.  Also, Sanatana Resources has a “ROFR” onthe 9 Augen claims north of the Cote Lake discovery that TRR has to acquire forthem the complete a “Positive Feasibility Study”.

 

Without these lands TRR will be in a very awkwardposition and its’ shareholders  willbe affected accordingly.

 

Whatever happens to GLD, a similar scenario couldoccur for STA, i.e. a take over bid (??)

 

So, basically, the TRR evaluations to date should besplit up with Augen and Sanatana.  A third each would be nice but that may be pushing it. 

 

What a beautiful ‘dilemma’ for GLD and STA. 

 

p.s. I trust this will work well for all threecompanies and respective shareholders.

 

w

Comment by BARN_BREATH on Jul 15, 2011 12:17pm
Exactly-----that's what I thought, and posted!!!Interestingly---A point that I think was missed isThat the offer for Augen is NOT for a fixed amount of cash.GLD gets a PERCENTAGE number of shares in TRR.Hence as the share price of TRR rises, and it is very quickly doing so,in effect, by definition, so is the resultant  "compensation" that TRRis actually buying them out for ...more  
Comment by pixy242 on Jul 15, 2011 1:05pm
Wally, tks for the input.  However, if Trelawney needs Augen land to fully recover all the ounces on their land,  wouldn't the reverse hold good for Augen   ?  
Comment by wallyz on Jul 16, 2011 12:02am
Hello Pixy Your question is 'bang' on, yes it works on both sides of the property line in this instance.  And in my view the offer for GLD should be much higher then .066 TRR shares.  Even if there is not gold on GLD side, the value has to be worth then .066.  I understand that STA and or GLD has done drilling or will be drilling long before the expiration of the 50 days ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse