FACT or Fiction
Lets test the validity of the following statement made by taylor 1988.
Statement made in reponse to another poster
" Kinross has been mining their Fort Knox deposit in Alaska for the past 3.5 years at a grade of 0.43 g/t au (less than half of TRR's grades) and they've done so 75 km from any work-force and with gold at $700 / oz. Trelawney is 500% closer to infrastructure than Fort Knox, they have 110% higher grades than Fort Knox and the price of gold has increased by $1,000 dollars since Kinross began mining Fort Knox profitably. My question to you which puzzles me is how Kinross can run a successful mining operation 4 years ago in a worse jurisdiction with half the grades of TRR"
Fact:
The fact is they don't mine .43 g/t at Fort Knox.
Here is a summary of actual grades mined at Fort Knox by quarter as per Kinross operational summaries
- Q3 2008 .96 g/t
- Q4 2008 .80 g/t
- Q1 2009 .58 g/t
- Q2 2009 .74 g/t
- Q3 2009 .80 g/t
- Q4 2009 .65 g/t
- Q1 2010 .71 g/t
- Q2 2010 .76 g/t
- Q3 2010 .96 g/t
- Q4 2010 .72 g/t
- Q1 2011 .66 g/t
- Q2 2011 .59 g/t
- Q3 2011 .49 g/t
DING DING DING Crapolla meter ringing off the charts.