Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Trelawney Mining and Exploration Inc TWNNF

GREY:TWNNF - Post Discussion

View:
Post by diabase1 on Apr 02, 2012 5:36pm

A Comparison

Looking at a comparison between the results from Probe’s news release today, and Gold Canyon’s Springpole Lake deposit, and Trelawney’s Cote’s deposit news releases on February 27.

 

                        Total gold        Total Silver      Grade Au         Grade Ag

Probe

Indicated         3.5M oz           3M oz              0.82 g/t           0.7g/t

Inferred           1.5M oz           1.5M oz           0.7 g/t             0.7 g/t

 

Gold Canyon 

Indicated         1.22M oz         4.82M oz         1.26 g/t           5 g/t

Inferred           2.45M oz         11.58M oz       1.27 g/t           6 g/t

 

Trelawney

Indicated         0.89M oz         N/A                  0.88 g/t           N/A

Inferred           5.66M oz         N/A                  0.97 g/t           N/A

 

The above are based on a 0.40 g/t cut-off.

N/A means not announced.

 

I thought the above was an interesting comparison, leaving out all the other issues (including lakes etc). I believe that Gold Canyon, Probe, as well as Trelawney, may have their own water issues (lakes or creeks).

 

These 3 projects will have a tremendous economical impact on each of their locations. I also believe that each company are also environmentally sensitive to the needs of society within their surroundings. A large group of naysayers however, are standing by, and so they should!!!!   

 

Putting the issues aside, any comments on the released reserve comparisons?

Comment by godisgr81 on Apr 03, 2012 8:29am
One important factor that you didn't mention in your comparison is that both Probe and Grand Canyon have to go to market to raise capital this year. Likely dilution will be 10-20%.  Good luck.
Comment by LTGoldBull on Apr 03, 2012 10:01am
godisgr8 "One important factor that you didn't mention in your comparison is that both Probe and Grand Canyon have to go to market to raise capital this year. Likely dilution will be 10-20%" What??? PRB has $32M cash of it's $90M MCap plus 10MT's Chromite 4sale. Facts only please,...for disclosure own both TRR and PRB. Cheers, Mark
Comment by godisgr81 on Apr 03, 2012 1:26pm
Both PRB and GCU will go to market for more equity financing. I don't think PRB will not end the year with less than $10 million in the bank. The burn rate for both are quite high. The current sp speaks for itself.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities